Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32306007›Full record

ArticleBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2020

[Efficacy and safety of oral pyrotinib in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer: real-world practice].

G H Song, H P Li, L J DI, Y Yan, H F Jiang, L Xu, D G Wan, Y Li, M P Wang, Y Xiao and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

G H SongKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education; Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
H P LiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education; Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
L J DIKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education; Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Y YanKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education; Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
H F JiangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education; Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
L XuBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
D G WanDepartment of TCM Oncology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
Y LiDepartment of Oncology, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China.
M P WangDepartment of Tumor Chemotherapy and Radiation Sickness, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Y XiaoDepartment of Tumor Chemotherapy and Radiation Sickness, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
R Y ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education; Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
R RanKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education; Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
H WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education; Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Ministry of Education · ETPeking University · CNChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePyrotinib, a novel irreversible pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed promising antitumor activity and acceptable tolerability in phase II and phase III randomized clinical trials. We assessed the activity and safety of oral pyrotinib for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive metastatic breast cancer patients in the real world.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 72 HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who received oral pyrotinib based regimens at Beijing Cancer Hospital and other four hospitals (Peking University First Hospital, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, General Hospital of PLA, Peking University Third Hospital) from August 2018 to September 2019. Progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AE) of pyrotinib were investigated.

resultsSeventy-two patients with HER2 positive MBC were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range: 32-79 years). Sixty-nine (95.8%) patients had received anti-HER2 treatment in the metastatic and/or (neo) adjuvant settings; 61 (84.7%) patients had received anti-HER2 treatments in the metastatic setting in terms of trastuzumab 56 (77.8%) patients, lapatinib 36 (50.0%) patients, and T-DM1 4 (5.6%) patients. Among these 72 patients who received oral pyrotinib based regimens, 62 (86.1%) patients received pyrotinib (±trastuzumab) in combination with chemotherapy, 6 (8.3%) patients received pyrotinib (± trastuzumab) in combination with endocrine therapy and 4 (5.6%) patients received pyrotinib (±trastuzumab). Sixty-five (90.3%) patients received 400 mg pyrotinib once daily as initial dose, and 7 (9.7%) patients received 320 mg. OBJECTIVE response and safety to pyrotinib based therapy were evaluable in all the 72 patients. One (1.4%) patient achieved complete response (CR), 18 (25.0%) patients achieved partial response (PR), 41 (56.9%) patients had stable disease (SD), and 12 (16.7%) patients had progressive disease (PD). The ORR (CR+PR) was 26.4% and the median PFS was 7.6 months (95%CI: 5.5-9.7 months). Among the 36 patients with prior lapatinib therapy, the median PFS was 7.9 months (95%CI: 4.1-11.7 months). Among the 15 patients with brain metastasis, the median PFS was 6.0 months (95%CI: 2.2-9.8 months). The main toxicities related to pyrotinib were diarrhea in 57 (79.2%) cases, and 48 (66.7%) cases with grade 1-2 as well as 9 (12.5%) cases with grade 3.

conclusionPyrotinib based therapy is an effective treatment for patients with HER2 positive MBC, including patients with lapatinib treatment failure and brain metastasis, and the toxicities can be tolerated.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAcrylamidesAdultAgedAminoquinolinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChinaErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesTrastuzumabTreatment OutcomeAcrylamidesAminoquinolinesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasespyrotinibTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID32306007
PMCPMC7433442
OpenAlexW3017124984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.