Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32305938›Full record

ReviewIEEE reviews in biomedical engineering2021

Harnessing Machine Intelligence in Automatic Echocardiogram Analysis: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Ghada Zamzmi, Li-Yueh Hsu, Wen Li, Vandana Sachdev, Sameer Antani

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ghada Zamzmi
Li-Yueh Hsu
Wen Li
Vandana Sachdev
Sameer Antani
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for clinical medical image processingZIALM010018 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI ANTANI, SAMEER · 2021 to 2025
$9.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 LM999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Echocardiography (echo) is a critical tool in diagnosing various cardiovascular diseases. Despite its diagnostic and prognostic value, interpretation and analysis of echo images are still widely performed manually by echocardiographers. A plethora of algorithms has been proposed to analyze medical ultrasound data using signal processing and machine learning techniques. These algorithms provided opportunities for developing automated echo analysis and interpretation systems. The automated approach can significantly assist in decreasing the variability and burden associated with manual image measurements. In this paper, we review the state-of-the-art automatic methods for analyzing echocardiography data. Particularly, we comprehensively and systematically review existing methods of four major tasks: echo quality assessment, view classification, boundary segmentation, and disease diagnosis. Our review covers three echo imaging modes, which are B-mode, M-mode, and Doppler. We also discuss the challenges and limitations of current methods and outline the most pressing directions for future research. In summary, this review presents the current status of automatic echo analysis and discusses the challenges that need to be addressed to obtain robust systems suitable for efficient use in clinical settings or point-of-care testing.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAlgorithmsCardiovascular DiseasesEchocardiographyHeartHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID32305938
PMCPMC8077725
OpenAlexW3016542203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.