ArticleActa biomaterialia2020
Functionally engineered extracellular vesicles improve bone regeneration.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
121 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.
- Would Exosome Therapy be Effective for Bone Regeneration? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Calcified tissue international · 2025Pooled it
- Would Exosome Therapy be Effective for Bone Regeneration? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Calcified tissue international · 2025Pooled it
- MSC-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Preclinical Animal Models of Bone Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Pooled it
- Extracellular vesicles as bioactive nanotherapeutics: An emerging paradigm for regenerative medicine.Theranostics · 2022Pooled it
- Therapeutic Effect of Exosomes Derived From Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review Based on Animal Studies.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Review
- Extracellular Vesicles and Their Role in Osteogenesis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Therapeutic strategy for exosome-based bone regeneration to osteoporosis: Challenges and potential solutions.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Engineered small extracellular vesicles as bioactive materials: Integrating engineering strategies for cargo loading and targeted delivery systems.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Biomimetic nanovesicles and nanotechnology for oral and maxillofacial diseases.Discover nano · 2026Review
- The immunomodulatory power of mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles in bone disorders: A comprehensive review.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Osteoimmunology uncovered: How macrophages and biomaterials revolutionize bone healing.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Exosomes in Bone Generation and Repair: Focusing on Bone Microenvironmental Crosstalk and Engineering Biomaterial Designs.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Tissue regeneration strategies based on mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: from bench to bedside.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Exosomes as Precise Regulators of the Osteoimmune Microenvironment: Engineering Strategies for Bone Regeneration.Biomaterials research · 2026Review
- Exosome Purification Strategy Influences the Regenerative Efficacy of Dental Pulp Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes in Bone Regeneration.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
- Decoding the secretory blueprint of bone healing: from gradients to regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Anatomical implant region - a critical determinant for the osteogenic potency of small extracellular vesicles and rhBMP-2.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
- Advances in extracellular vesicle-based nanomedicine for regenerative orthopaedics.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Bioengineered hollow nanoflowers to synergistically modulate inflammation, angiogenesis and osteogenesis for enhancing repair of bone defects.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Lineage specific differentiation of host mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is a necessary step for bone repair/regeneration. Clinically, growth factors such as bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) are used to enhance/hasten this process to heal critical sized defects. However, the clinical application of such growth factors is fraught with dosage challenges as well as immunological and ectopic complications. The identification of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as active components of the MSC secretome suggest alternative approaches to enhancing bone regeneration. Based on our earlier studies on the properties of EVs from lineage specified MSCs, this study sought to engineer EVs to enhance osteogenic differentiation. To generate MSC EVs with enhanced osteoinductive abilities, genetically modified human bone marrow derived MSCs (HMSCs) were generated by constitutively expressing BMP2. We hypothesized that these cells would generate functionally engineered EVs (FEEs) with enhanced osteoinductive properties. Our results show that these FEEs maintained the general physical and biochemical characteristics of naïve HMSC EVs in the form of size distribution, EV marker expression and endocytic properties but show increased bone regenerative potential compared to MSC EVs in a rat calvarial defect model in vivo. Mechanistic studies revealed that although BMP2 was constitutively expressed in the parental cells, the corresponding EVs (FEEs) do not contain BMP2 protein as an EV constituent. Further investigations revealed that the FEEs potentiate the BMP2 signaling cascade possibly due to an altered miRNA composition. Collectively, these studies indicate that EVs' functionality may be engineered by genetic modification of the parental MSCs to induce osteoinduction and bone regeneration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: With mounting evidence for the potential of MSC EVs in treatment of diseases and regeneration of tissues, it is imperative to evaluate if they can be modified for application specificity. The results presented here indicate the possibility for generating Functionally Engineered EVs (FEEs) from MSC sources. As a proof of concept approach, we have shown that EVs derived from genetically modified MSCs (BMP2 overexpression) can be effective as biomimetic substitutes for growth factors for enhanced tissue-specific regeneration (bone regeneration) in vivo. Mechanistic studies highlight the role of EV miRNAs in inducing pathway-specific changes. We believe that this study will be useful to researchers evaluating EVs for regenerative medicine applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.