Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32305217›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry2020

Development of Brain Networks In Utero: Relevance for Common Neural Disorders.

Moriah E Thomason

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Cognitive-Affective Social Processing and Emotion Regulation (CASPER) model.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Moriah E ThomasonDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Population Health, and Neuroscience Institute, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York. Electronic address: moriah.thomason@nyulangone.org.
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

Examining Prenatal Inflammation and Neurodevelopment in a Longitudinal Fetal-to-Age 9 Imaging Study - Administrative SupplementR01MH122447 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI THOMASON, MORIAH E, TRENTACOSTA, CHRISTOPHER J · 2020 to 2025
$3.9M
In Utero Assessment of the Human Neural Connectome and Later Child BehaviorR01MH110793 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2016 to 2021
$2.7M
From the womb to the classroom: Linking perinatal micronutrients and toxicants to neural and behavioral development in utero and in childhoodR01ES032294 · NIEHS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MARTINEZ, MAURO, THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2020 to 2024
$2.6M
4:4 Investigation of opioid exposure and neurodevelopment (iOPEN)R34DA050287 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BERGINK, VEERLE, THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2019 to 2021
$979k
Consequences of prenatal toxicant exposure on fetal brain functionR21ES026022 · NIEHS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BURT, S. ALEXANDRA, THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2015 to 2016
$451k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA050287NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES032294NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110793NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging, histological, and gene analysis approaches in living and nonliving human fetuses and in prematurely born neonates have provided insight into the staged processes of prenatal brain development. Increased understanding of micro- and macroscale brain network development before birth has spurred interest in understanding the relevance of prenatal brain development to common neurological diseases. Questions abound as to the sensitivity of the intrauterine brain to environmental programming, to windows of plasticity, and to the prenatal origin of disorders of childhood that involve disruptions in large-scale network connectivity. Much of the available literature on human prenatal neural development comes from cross-sectional or case studies that are not able to resolve the longitudinal consequences of individual variation in brain development before birth. This review will 1) detail specific methodologies for studying the human prenatal brain, 2) summarize large-scale human prenatal neural network development, integrating findings from across a variety of experimental approaches, 3) explore the plasticity of the early developing brain as well as potential sex differences in prenatal susceptibility, and 4) evaluate opportunities to link specific prenatal brain developmental processes to the forms of aberrant neural connectivity that underlie common neurological disorders of childhood.

Indexed as

BrainNervous System DiseasesBrain MappingChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysPregnancyChildConnectivityFetalMRIPrenatalPsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID32305217
PMCPMC7808399
OpenAlexW3008761310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.