ArticleTrends in plant science2020
Achieving Plant Genome Editing While Bypassing Tissue Culture.
Article in Trends in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expression of Dual Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac Genes Under Regulation of MPI Promoter Enhances Resistance to Tomato Fruit Borer (Helicoverpa armigera) in Tomato.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Article
- CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Its Applications in Cereal Crop Improvement.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Current Advancement and Future Prospects in Simplified Transformation-Based Plant Genome Editing.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Highly EfficientPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A simple and efficient in planta transformation method based on the active regeneration capacity of plants.Plant communications · 2024Article
- The economics and policy of genome editing in crop improvement.The plant genome · 2023Review
- Cut-dip-budding delivery system enables genetic modifications in plants without tissue culture.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2023Article
- CRISPR-Cas: A robust technology for enhancing consumer-preferred commercial traits in crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Progress and challenges in applying CRISPR/Cas techniques to the genome editing of trees.Forestry research · 2022Review
- CRISPR for accelerating genetic gains in under-utilized crops of the drylands: Progress and prospects.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Current status and trends in forest genomics.Forestry research · 2022Review
- Present and future prospects for wheat improvement through genome editing and advanced technologies.Plant communications · 2021Review
- Genome sequence and genetic diversity analysis of an under-domesticated orphan crop, white fonio (Digitaria exilis).GigaScience · 2021Article
- Genes and genome editing tools for breeding desirable phenotypes in ornamentals.Plant cell reports · 2021Review
- Maize In Planta Haploid Inducer Lines: A Cornerstone for Doubled Haploid Technology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
- Progresses, Challenges, and Prospects of Genome Editing in Soybean (Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional genetic transformation is a huge obstacle to the efficient development and application of plant genome-editing (GE) technologies. Recently, Maher et al. reported successful GE by de novo reprogramming plant meristems in somatic tissues, which sidesteps tissue culture-based transformation and promises to significantly enhance the utility of plant GE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.