Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32304649›Full record

ReviewThe lancet. Psychiatry2020

Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science.

Emily A Holmes, Rory C O'Connor, V Hugh Perry, Irene Tracey, Simon Wessely, Louise Arseneault, Clive Ballard, Helen Christensen, Roxane Cohen Silver, Ian Everall and 15 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2,655 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,655citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04400279 nacompletednot on this map

COvid-19 Pandemic and Exercise (COPE) Trial: A Randomized Study Examining Physical Activities and Wellbeing in Individuals Mandated to Stay at Home

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2020 to 2020Enrolled334ConditionsDepressive Symptomatology, Psychological Distress, Health BehaviorArmsYoga group, High Intensity Interval Training group, Combination
NCT04646642 completednot on this map

Psychological Health, Coping Strategies and Preferences of David Grant USAF Medical Center COVID-19 Deployers: A Critical Needs Assessment

TypeobservationalSponsorDavid Grant U.S. Air Force Medical CenterRan2020 to 2021Enrolled21ConditionsCoping Skills, Healthcare Workers, Covid19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,655 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2,595 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Emily A HolmesDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rory C O'ConnorSuicidal Behaviour Research Laboratory, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
V Hugh PerryUK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Irene TraceyNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Simon WesselyInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Louise ArseneaultInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Clive BallardUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Helen ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Roxane Cohen SilverDepartment of Psychological Science, Department of Medicine, and Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, USA.
Ian EverallInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Tamsin FordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ann JohnSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Thomas KabirThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
Kate KingIndependent, Cambridge, UK.
Ira MadanDepartment of Occupational Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Susan MichieUCL Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew K PrzybylskiOxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Roz ShafranUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Angela SweeneyPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Carol M WorthmanAnthropology Faculty, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Lucy YardleySchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Katherine CowanKatherine Cowan Consulting Ltd, St Leonards-on-Sea, UK.
Claire CopeAcademy of Medical Sciences, London, UK. Electronic address: claire.cope@acmedsci.ac.uk.
Matthew HotopfInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the Maudsley, Maudsley Hospital, London, UK.
Ed BullmoreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Research and Development, Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_G0802534Medical Research Council MC_UP_0901/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/15Medical Research Council MR/V027751/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is having a profound effect on all aspects of society, including mental health and physical health. We explore the psychological, social, and neuroscientific effects of COVID-19 and set out the immediate priorities and longer-term strategies for mental health science research. These priorities were informed by surveys of the public and an expert panel convened by the UK Academy of Medical Sciences and the mental health research charity, MQ: Transforming Mental Health, in the first weeks of the pandemic in the UK in March, 2020. We urge UK research funding agencies to work with researchers, people with lived experience, and others to establish a high level coordination group to ensure that these research priorities are addressed, and to allow new ones to be identified over time. The need to maintain high-quality research standards is imperative. International collaboration and a global perspective will be beneficial. An immediate priority is collecting high-quality data on the mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic across the whole population and vulnerable groups, and on brain function, cognition, and mental health of patients with COVID-19. There is an urgent need for research to address how mental health consequences for vulnerable groups can be mitigated under pandemic conditions, and on the impact of repeated media consumption and health messaging around COVID-19. Discovery, evaluation, and refinement of mechanistically driven interventions to address the psychological, social, and neuroscientific aspects of the pandemic are required. Rising to this challenge will require integration across disciplines and sectors, and should be done together with people with lived experience. New funding will be required to meet these priorities, and it can be efficiently leveraged by the UK's world-leading infrastructure. This Position Paper provides a strategy that may be both adapted for, and integrated with, research efforts in other countries.

Indexed as

ResearchCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansMental DisordersPandemicsPneumonia, Viral

Identifiers

PMID32304649
PMCPMC7159850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.