ArticleMedical physics2020
Performance test methods for near-infrared fluorescence imaging.
Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- High frequency miniaturized transducer for facial and lingual full-mouth human imaging including third molars.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Optical phantoms for the characterization and validation of imaging and spectroscopy: a review.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Review
- Intraoperative Doppler Ultrasonography with Superb Microvascular Imaging for Intestinal Perfusion Assessment in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Pilot Study.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026Article
- Reflect: reporting guidelines for preclinical, translational and clinical fluorescence molecular imaging studies.Npj imaging · 2025Article
- Review
- Performance Evaluation of a Miniaturized, Toothbrush-Shaped Ultrasound Transducer for Periodontal Imaging.ACS sensors · 2025Article
- Article
- Harmonized technical standard test methods for quality evaluation of medical fluorescence endoscopic imaging systems.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025Article
- A novel flexible near-infrared endoscopic device that enables real-time artificial intelligence fluorescence tissue characterization.PloS one · 2025Article
- Impact of signal-to-noise ratio and contrast definition on the sensitivity assessment and benchmarking of fluorescence molecular imaging systems.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Case report: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary arteriovenous malformation using near-infrared fluorescence with indocyanine green.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Impact of Surgical Lights on the Performance of Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Systems: A Pilot Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Characterizing a photoacoustic and fluorescence imaging platform for preclinical murine longitudinal studies.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- 3D-Printed Tumor Phantoms for Assessment of In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging Analysis Methods.Molecular imaging and biology · 2023Article
- Biomimetic tissue phantoms for neurosurgical near-infrared fluorescence imaging.Neurophotonics · 2023Article
- Imaging peripheral lymphatic dysfunction in chronic conditions.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- Performance of two clinical fluorescence imaging systems with different targeted and non-targeted near-infrared fluorophores: a cadaveric explorative study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Conversion of imager-specific response to tissue phantom fluorescence into system of units-traceable units.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Standardization and implementation of fluorescence molecular endoscopy in the clinic.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Shot noise limits on binary detection in multiphoton imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNear-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging using exogenous contrast has gained much attention as a technique for enhancing visualization of vasculature using untargeted agents, as well as for the detection and localization of cancer with targeted agents. In order to address the emerging need for standardization of NIRF imaging technologies, it is necessary to identify the best practices suitable for objective, quantitative testing of key image quality characteristics. Toward the development of a battery of test methods that are rigorous yet applicable to a wide variety of devices, we have evaluated techniques for phantom design, measurement, and calculation of specific performance metrics.
methodsUsing a NIRF imaging system for indocyanine green imaging, providing excitation at 780 nm and detection above 830 nm, we explored methods to evaluate uniformity, field of view, spectral crosstalk, spatial resolution, depth of field, sensitivity, linearity, and penetration depth. These measurements were performed using fluorophore-doped multiwell plate and high turbidity planar phantoms, as well as a 3D-printed multichannel phantom and a USAF 1951 resolution target. RESULTS AND
conclusionsBased on a wide range of approaches described in medical and fluorescence imaging literature, we have developed and demonstrated a cohesive battery of test methods for evaluation of fluorescence image quality in wide-field imagers. We also propose a number of key metrics that can facilitate direct, quantitative comparison of device performance. These methods have the potential to facilitate more uniform evaluation and inter-comparison of clinical and preclinical imaging systems than is typically achieved, with the long-term goal of establishing international standards for fluorescence image quality assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.