Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32304512›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2020

Obstetricians on the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Front Lines and the Confusing World of Personal Protective Equipment.

Denise J Jamieson, James P Steinberg, Richard A Martinello, Trish M Perl, Sonja A Rasmussen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Five years after the COVID-19 pandemic began: lessons on vaccination and obstetric care in Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Coronavirus disease 2019 and pregnancy is déjà vu all over again.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Postscript: Women's Health and the Era After COVID-19.Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  9. Health-related quality of life and quality of care in pregnant and postnatal women during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessment of the preparedness of obstetrics and gynecology healthcare systems during the COVID-19 pandemic in Libya.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denise J JamiesonDepartments of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; the Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, and the Department of Infection Prevention, Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; and the Departments of Pediatrics and Epidemiology, University of Florida College of Medicine & College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, Florida.
James P Steinberg
Richard A Martinello
Trish M Perl
Sonja A Rasmussen
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As health care systems struggle to maintain adequate supplies of personal protective equipment, there is confusion and anxiety among obstetricians and others about how to best protect themselves, their coworkers, and their patients. Although use of personal protective equipment is a critical strategy to protect health care personnel from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), other strategies also need to be implemented on labor and delivery units to reduce the risk of health care-associated transmission, including screening of all pregnant women who present for care (case identification), placing a mask on and rapidly isolating ill pregnant women, and minimizing the number of personnel who enter the room of an ill patient (physical distancing). Although the mechanism of transmission of COVID-19 is not known with certainty, current evidence suggests that COVID-19 is transmitted primarily through respiratory droplets. Therefore, strict adherence to hand hygiene and consistent use of recommended personal protective equipment are cornerstones for reducing transmission. In addition, it is critical that health care professionals receive training on and practice correct donning (putting on) and doffing (removing) of personal protective equipment and avoid touching their faces as well as their facial protection to minimize self-contamination.

Indexed as

ObstetricsPersonal Protective EquipmentBetacoronavirusCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Coronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInfection ControlPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancySARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID32304512
PMCPMC7188024
OpenAlexW3016440373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.