Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32304291›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2020

Deep learning with diffusion basis spectrum imaging for classification of multiple sclerosis lesions.

Zezhong Ye, Ajit George, Anthony T Wu, Xuan Niu, Joshua Lin, Gautam Adusumilli, Robert T Naismith, Anne H Cross, Peng Sun, Sheng-Kwei Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zezhong YeDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110.ORCID 0000-0003-0369-7432
Ajit GeorgeDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110.
Anthony T WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, 63130.
Xuan NiuDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110.
Joshua LinKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 90033.
Gautam AdusumilliDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110.
Robert T NaismithDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110.
Anne H CrossDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110.ORCID 0000-0003-0829-7569
Peng SunDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110.ORCID 0000-0002-9697-4656
Sheng-Kwei SongDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110.

Funding

Validating diffusion MRI biomarkers of inflammation and axon pathologies in EAEP01NS059560 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SONG, SHENG-KWEI · 2008 to 2018
$11.3M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS059560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMultiple sclerosis (MS) lesions are heterogeneous with regard to inflammation, demyelination, axonal injury, and neuronal loss. We previously developed a diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) technique to better address MS lesion heterogeneity. We hypothesized that the profiles of multiple DBSI metrics can identify lesion-defining patterns. Here we test this hypothesis by combining a deep learning algorithm using deep neural network (DNN) with DBSI and other imaging methods.

methodsThirty-eight MS patients were scanned with diffusion-weighted imaging, magnetization transfer imaging, and standard conventional MRI sequences (cMRI). A total of 499 regions of interest were identified on standard MRI and labeled as persistent black holes (PBH), persistent gray holes (PGH), acute black holes (ABH), acute gray holes (AGH), nonblack or gray holes (NBH), and normal appearing white matter (NAWM). DBSI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) were applied to the 43,261 imaging voxels extracted from these ROIs. The optimized DNN with 10 fully connected hidden layers was trained using the imaging metrics of the lesion subtypes and NAWM.

resultsConcordance, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were determined for the different imaging methods. DBSI-DNN derived lesion classification achieved 93.4% overall concordance with predetermined lesion types, compared with 80.2% for DTI-DNN model, 78.3% for MTR-DNN model, and 74.2% for cMRI-DNN model. DBSI-DNN also produced the highest specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy.

conclusionsDBSI-DNN improves the classification of different MS lesion subtypes, which could aid clinical decision making. The efficacy and efficiency of DBSI-DNN shows great promise for clinical applications in automatic MS lesion detection and classification.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleGray MatterHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisSensitivity and SpecificityWhite Matter

Identifiers

PMID32304291
PMCPMC7261762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.