ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2020
Identifying fibroblast growth factor receptor genetic alterations using RNA-based assays in patients with metastatic or locally advanced, surgically unresectable, urothelial carcinoma who may benefit from erdafitinib treatment.
Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis on the safety and efficacy of Erdafitinib in treating FGFR1-4 mutated solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Development and deployment of a histopathology-based deep learning algorithm for patient prescreening in a clinical trial.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Alternative splicing patterns reveal prognostic indicator in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- The Effect of Posaconazole and Isavuconazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Erdafitinib in Beagle Dogs by UPLC-MS/MS.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erdafitinib, a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in adult patients with specific FGFR3/2 genetic alterations who progressed during or after ≥1 line of prior platinum-containing chemotherapy (PCC), including within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant PCC. Concordance between the clinical trial assay (CTA) used in a phase 2 study and QIAGEN's therascreen® FGFR kit (a two-step, multiplex, real-time, RT-PCR assay), the FDA-approved companion diagnostic (CDx) with erdafitinib, was evaluated in this bridging study. Study samples included 100 CTA-confirmed FGFR-positive samples from 100 erdafitinib-treated mUC patients, plus 200 CTA-confirmed FGFR-negative samples from the phase 2 study. The primary objective was met if the lower bound of 95% CI of objective response rate (ORR) in CDx-confirmed patients with FGFR alterations was >25%. Demographics were similar between the bridging study and CTA-screened patients. In total, 292 of 300 samples (97.3%) with valid CDx results showed high analytical concordance versus CTA (percent agreement [95% CI]: positive percent agreement, 87.2 [79.0; 92.5]; negative percent agreement, 97.0 [93.5; 98.6]; overall percent agreement, 93.8 [90.5; 96.1]). Investigator-assessed ORR in the 81 CDx-identified, erdafitinib-treated patients who tested positive for both assays was 45.7% (95% CI: 35.3%; 56.5%) versus 40.4% (95% CI: 30.7%; 50.1%) for CTA and met the criteria for primary objective. High ORR and clinical concordance to CTA suggest that QIAGEN's CDx can reliably select mUC patients who would potentially benefit from erdafitinib treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.