Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32303862›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2020

Adherence to and persistence with zoledronic acid treatment for osteoporosis-reasons for early discontinuation.

Anna Spångeus, Simon Johansson, Mischa Woisetschläger

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Long-term persistence with denosumab: real-world data from the Austrian Osteoporosis Clinic (AOC). A retrospective data analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna SpångeusDepartment of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden. anna.spangeus@liu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7130-9158
Simon JohanssonDivision of Diagnostics and Specialist Medicine, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Mischa WoisetschlägerDivision of Diagnostics and Specialist Medicine, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0066-4985
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective study reports 81% long-term (> 3 years) adherence to and 77% persistence with zoledronic acid (ZA) treatment in osteoporosis patients, with ZA being costfree for patients. Eight percent of patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (AEs), with a tendency of higher discontinuation rate in older patients. PURPOSE: This study investigated (1) long-term adherence to and persistence with ZA treatment in a real-world setting, (2) extent to which an adverse reaction to ZA impacted on adherence and persistence, and (3) whether there were sex or age differences in patients that had early treatment termination (ETT) due to AEs and those who adhered to the regimen.

methodsAll patients treated with ZA at the Endocrinology Department at Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden between 2012 and 2017 were included. ETT was defined as < 3 ZA infusions, which was confirmed from patients' medical records.

resultsA total of 414 patients were treated with ZA, with 81% receiving > 3 ZA infusions. Three-year persistence was 77% for a treatment window of 365 days ± 90 days (75% with 365 days ± 60 days window). The most common reason for ETT was AEs (8%), followed by medical conditions (5%), biological aging (3%), and other (e.g., lost to follow-up [3%]). Most patients who discontinued treatment because of AEs reported symptoms of acute-phase reaction, and tended to be older than those who adhered to treatment (74 ± 9 vs 70 ± 13 years, p = 0.064). There was no difference in sex ratio between the 2 groups (85% vs 90% females, p = 0.367).

conclusionRates of long-term adherence to and persistence with ZA treatment were high with a pre-scheduled 3-year treatment regimen in the tax-financed Swedish healthcare system. AEs-mainly acute-phase reaction-were the most common reason for ETT, occurring in nearly 1 out of 10 patients.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAgedBone Density Conservation AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisRetrospective StudiesSwedenTime FactorsWithholding TreatmentZoledronic AcidBone Density Conservation AgentsZoledronic AcidAdherenceAdverse eventBisphosphonateDiscontinuationOsteoporosisZoledronic acid

Identifiers

PMID32303862
PMCPMC7165128
OpenAlexW3016443096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.