Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32303861›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2020

Deep learning detection and quantification of pneumothorax in heterogeneous routine chest computed tomography.

Sebastian Röhrich, Thomas Schlegl, Constanze Bardach, Helmut Prosch, Georg Langs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pneumothorax and Hemothorax: Practical Approaches for Radiologists.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sebastian RöhrichDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas SchleglContextflow GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Constanze BardachDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Helmut ProschDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. helmut.prosch@meduniwien.ac.at.
Georg LangsComputational Imaging Research Lab, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 2714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutomatically detecting and quantifying pneumothorax on chest computed tomography (CT) may impact clinical decision-making. Machine learning methods published so far struggle with the heterogeneity of technical parameters and the presence of additional pathologies, highlighting the importance of stable algorithms.

methodsA deep residual UNet was developed and evaluated for automated, volume-level pneumothorax grading (i.e., labelling a volume whether a pneumothorax was present or not), and pixel-level classification (i.e., segmentation and quantification of pneumothorax), on a retrospective series of routine chest CT data. Ground truth annotations were provided by radiologists. The fully automated pixel-level pneumothorax segmentation method was trained using 43 chest CT scans and evaluated on 9 chest CT scans with pixel-level annotation basis and 567 chest CT scans on a volume-level basis.

resultsThis method achieved a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98, an average precision of 0.97, and a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.94. This segmentation performance resulted to be similar to the inter-rater segmentation accuracy of two radiologists, who achieved a DSC of 0.92. The comparison of manual and automated pneumothorax quantification yielded a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.996. The volume-level pneumothorax grading accuracy was evaluated on 567 chest CT scans and yielded an AUC of 0.98 and an average precision of 0.95.

conclusionsWe proposed a deep learning method for the detection and quantification of pneumothorax in heterogeneous routine clinical data that may facilitate the automated triage of urgent examinations and enable treatment decision support.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiography, ThoracicTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPneumothoraxRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDeep learningPneumothoraxThoraxTomography (x-ray computed)Triage

Identifiers

PMID32303861
PMCPMC7165213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.