Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32303799›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

The English Knee Self-Efficacy Scale is a valid and reliable measure for knee-specific self-efficacy in individuals with a sport-related knee injury in the past 5 years.

Allison M Ezzat, Jackie L Whittaker, Mariana Brussoni, Louise C Mâsse, Carolyn A Emery

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Allison M EzzatSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. allison.ezzat@ubc.ca.
Jackie L WhittakerDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Mariana BrussoniSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Louise C MâsseSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Carolyn A EmerySport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAAlberta Children's Hospital · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo translate and cross-culturally adapt the Swedish Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (K-SES) into English and evaluate the measurement properties in a sample of individuals with previous knee injury.

methodsTranslation, cross-cultural adaptation, and evaluation followed the Beaton multi-step process and COSMIN guidelines. Participants (n = 125) aged 16-60 years with a sport-related intra-articular tibiofemoral or patellofemoral injury within the last 5 years completed the K-SES, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury Scale, Tegner Activity Level Scale, and Multi-dimensional Health Locus of Control. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested a-priori two-factor structure and model fit. Cronbach-alpha, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and absolute reliability (Bland-Altman plots) were calculated. Construct validity was assessed by eight pre-defined hypotheses. A sub-group of participants (n = 42) completed the K-SES twice to assess intra-rater reliability.

resultsThe cross-cultural adaptation generated an English K-SES with face and content validity. The original two-factor structure was rejected based on CFA and a revised solution informed by Exploratory Factor analysis resulted in an adequate fit. All construct validity hypotheses were confirmed. The K-SES showed good internal consistency [Factor (F1: α = 0.96; F2: α = 0.73)], intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.92), and no systematic bias between repeated measurements.

conclusionThe English K-SES is a valid and reliable measure for knee-specific self-efficacy in individuals who have sustained a sport-related intra-articular knee injury in the previous 5 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSelf EfficacyAdolescentAdultAthletic InjuriesChildFemaleHumansKnee InjuriesLysholm Knee ScoreMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSwedenTranslationsCross-cultural adaptionKnee injuryPatient-reported outcome measurePsychometricsSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID32303799
OpenAlexW3016843192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.