ArticleCurrent microbiology2020
Assessment of the Wettability of Hydrophobic Solid Substrate by Biosurfactant Produced by Bacillus aryabhattai SPS1001.
Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Production and characterization of the lipopeptide with anti-adhesion for oral biofilm on the surface of titanium for dental implants.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
- Kinetics and Production of Rhamnolipid fromIndian journal of microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Characterized biosurfactant produced by Bacillus aryabhattai SPS1001 isolated from crude oil contaminated soil of Haldia Oil Refinery, IOCL, West Bengal, India, was used to evaluate the surface energy and wettability of hydrophobic substrate by sessile drop method. Bacterial cell culture with cells removed was screened for biosurfactant production by drop collapse assay where drop diameter measured was 12.53 ± 0.01 mN/m and 11.79 ± 0.01 mN/m, respectively, on using hydrophobic substrate diesel oil and n-hexadecane in mineral salt medium. Moreover, the surface tension recorded was 24.4 ± 0.02 and 25.9 ± 0.02 mN/m, whereas interfacial tension measured was 0.28 ± 0.02 and 0.35 ± 0.04 mN/m against diesel oil and n-hexadecane, respectively. Additionally, at liquid-solid (silicone oil-coated glass surface) interface, decrease in contact angles of cell culture with cells removed sample (14.02 ± 0.2° and 14.95 ± 0.6°) translated into increase in surface energy of hydrophobic solid surface and quantitatively measured to 23.70 (diesel oil) and 24.57 (n-hexadecane) mN/m, respectively. Presence of biosurfactant in cell culture with cells removed sample plays an important role in lowering contact angle and in deciding the wetting condition of an oil-wet solid (silicone oil-coated) glass surface to water-wet state. Hence, the wetting property of biosurfactant finds applications in various areas such as coating, printing, etc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.