Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32303775›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2020

Economical optimization of a breeding scheme by selective phenotyping of the calibration set in a multi-trait context: application to bread making quality.

S Ben-Sadoun, R Rincent, J Auzanneau, F X Oury, B Rolland, E Heumez, C Ravel, G Charmet, S Bouchet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Portability of genomic predictions trained on sparse factorial designs across two maize silage breeding cycles.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A comparison of methods for training population optimization in genomic selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of genomic prediction reliability and optimization of experimental designs in multi-environment trials.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Genomic Prediction: Progress and Perspectives for Rice Improvement.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S Ben-SadounINRAE-Université Clermont-Auvergne, UMR1095, GDEC, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
R RincentINRAE-Université Clermont-Auvergne, UMR1095, GDEC, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
J AuzanneauAgri-Obtentions, Ferme de Gauvilliers, 78660, Orsonville, France.
F X OuryINRAE-Université Clermont-Auvergne, UMR1095, GDEC, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
B RollandINRAE-Agrocampus Ouest-Université Rennes 1, UMR 1349, IGEPP, BP 35327, 35653, Le Rheu Cedex, France.
E HeumezINRAE-UE Lille, 2 chaussée Brunehaut, Estrées-Mons, BP 50136, 80203, Peronne Cedex, France.
C RavelINRAE-Université Clermont-Auvergne, UMR1095, GDEC, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
G CharmetINRAE-Université Clermont-Auvergne, UMR1095, GDEC, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
S BouchetINRAE-Université Clermont-Auvergne, UMR1095, GDEC, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. sophie.bouchet@inra.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5868-3359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageTrait-assisted genomic prediction approach is a way to improve genetic gain by cost unit, by reducing budget allocated to phenotyping or by increasing the program's size for the same budget. This study compares different strategies of genomic prediction to optimize resource allocation in breeding schemes by using information from cheaper correlated traits to predict a more expensive trait of interest. We used bread wheat baking score (BMS) calculated for French registration as a case study. To conduct this project, 398 lines from a public breeding program were genotyped and phenotyped for BMS and correlated traits in 11 locations in France between 2000 and 2016. Single-trait (ST), multi-trait (MT) and trait-assisted (TA) strategies were compared in terms of predictive ability and cost. In MT and TA strategies, information from dough strength (W), a cheaper trait correlated with BMS (r = 0.45), was evaluated in the training population or in both the training and the validation sets, respectively. TA models allowed to reduce the budget allocated to phenotyping by up to 65% while maintaining the predictive ability of BMS. TA models also improved the predictive ability of BMS compared to ST models for a fixed budget (maximum gain: + 0.14 in cross-validation and + 0.21 in forward prediction). We also demonstrated that the budget can be further reduced by approximately one fourth while maintaining the same predictive ability by reducing the number of phenotypic records to estimate BMS adjusted means. In addition, we showed that the choice of the lines to be phenotyped can be optimized to minimize cost or maximize predictive ability. To do so, we extended the mean of the generalized coefficient of determination (CD

Indexed as

BreadCrops, AgriculturalPlant BreedingAgricultureBayes TheoremCalibrationFood TechnologyFranceGenomeGenomicsGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.