Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32303255›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2020

VENTILatOry strategies in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: the VENTILO Survey of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

Edoardo Picetti, Paolo Pelosi, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Giuseppe Citerio, Jordi Mancebo, Chiara Robba, on the behalf of the ESICM NIC/ARF sections

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04459884 (Multicenter Observational Study on Practice of Ventilation in Brain Injured Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04459884 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Multicenter Observational Study on Practice of Ventilation in Brain Injured Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of Milano BicoccaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled2,299ConditionsMechanical Ventilation, Acute Brain InjuryArmsmechanical ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Organ crosstalk: brain-lung interaction.Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Early sedation in traumatic brain injury: a multicentre international observational study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Edoardo PicettiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Parma University Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43100, Parma, Italy. edoardopicetti@hotmail.com.
Paolo PelosiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Giuseppe CiterioSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan - Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Jordi ManceboDepartment of Intensive Care, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Chiara RobbaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy.
on the behalf of the ESICM NIC/ARF sections
Hospital de Sant Pau · ESUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Parma · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients often develop acute respiratory failure. Optimal ventilator strategies in this setting are not well established. We performed an international survey to investigate the practice in the ventilatory management of TBI patients with and without respiratory failure.

methodsAn electronic questionnaire, including 38 items and 3 different clinical scenarios [arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO

resultsThere were 687 respondents [472 (69%) from Europe], mainly intensivists [328 (48%)] and anesthesiologists [206 (30%)]. A standard protocol for mechanical ventilation in TBI patients was utilized by 277 (40%) respondents and a specific weaning protocol by 198 (30%). The most common tidal volume (TV) applied was 6-8 ml/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) in scenarios 1-2 (72% PaO

conclusionsVentilatory management, targets and practice of adult severe TBI patients with and without respiratory failure are widely different among centres. These findings may be helpful to define future investigations in this topic.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrain Injuries, TraumaticChi-Square DistributionCritical CareEuropeFemaleHumansInternationalityMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialSurveys and QuestionnairesMechanical ventilationRespiratory failureTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32303255
PMCPMC7165367
OpenAlexW3016953798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.