Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2020
Comparison of two Norepinephrine rescue bolus for Management of Post-spinal Hypotension during Cesarean Delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Norepinephrine for Management of Post-spinal Anesthesia Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery: a Comparison of Two Bolus Doses
Comparison Between Different Norepinephrine Bolus Doses for Management of Post-spinal Hypotension During Ceaserian Section for Patients With Preeclampsia
Comparison of Two Different Norepinephrine Bolus Doses for Management of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Up-and-down determination of prophylactic norepinephrine boluses combined with crystalloid co-load for preventing post-spinal anesthesia hypotension during cesarean section.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Comparison of Two Norepinephrine Rescue Bolus Doses for Management of Severe Post-Spinal Hypotension During Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.International journal of general medicine · 2024Trial
- Comparison of Two Different Norepinephrine Bolus Doses for Management of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Maternal Hypotension in Cesarean Section: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The influence of thirty-degree leg elevation on noradrenaline requirements administered as a prophylactic variable infusion during cesarean delivery, an open-label randomized controlled trial.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Article
- Review
- Novel Obstetric Air Cushion for the Prevention of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
- Scoping Review: Is Push-Dose Norepinephrine a Better Choice?The western journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Use of vasopressors to manage spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2024Review
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Graded Dose-Response Study of Norepinephrine Administration for Prevention of Post-Spinal Hypotension during Elective Cesarean Delivery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Association of propofol induction dose and severe pre-incision hypotension among surgical patients over age 65.Journal of clinical anesthesia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData on the best norepinephrine bolus dose for management of hypotension are limited. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two norepinephrine bolus doses in the rescue management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery.
methodsThis randomized, controlled trial included mothers scheduled for cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia with a prophylactic norepinephrine infusion. Following spinal anaesthesia administration, a participant was considered hypotensive if systolic blood pressure was ≤80% compared to the baseline reading. Participants were allocated to receive either 6 mcg or 10 mcg norepinephrine bolus for the management of hypotensive episodes. The hemodynamic response after administration of norepinephrine bolus was recorded. The episode was considered successfully managed if systolic blood pressure returned to within 80% from the baseline reading within 2 min after norepinephrine bolus administration, and did not drop again within 6 min after the norepinephrine bolus. The primary outcome was the incidence of successful management of the first hypotensive episode. Other outcomes included systolic blood pressure, heart rate, incidence of maternal bradycardia, and reactive hypertension.
resultsOne hundred and ten mothers developed hypotensive episodes and received norepinephrine boluses for management. The number of successfully managed first hypotensive episodes was 50/57 (88%) in the 6 mcg-treated episodes and 45/53 (85%) in the 10 mcg-treated episodes (p = 0.78). Systolic blood pressure was comparable after administration of either bolus dose. Heart rate was lower after administration of 10 mcg bolus compared to 6 mcg bolus, without significant bradycardia requiring atropine administration. The incidence of reactive hypertension was comparable between both groups.
conclusionIn mothers undergoing elective cesarean delivery under prophylactic norepinephrine infusion at 0.05 mcg/kg/min, there was no advantage to the use of 10 mcg norepinephrine bolus over 6 mcg norepinephrine bolus for the rescue management of first hypotensive episode. Neither of the 2 bolus doses reached a 100% success rate. The incidences of bradycardia and reactive hypertension were comparable between both norepinephrine doses.
trial registrationAt clinicaltrial.gov registry system on January 4, 2019 Clinical trial identifier: NCT03792906.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.