Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32303057›Full record

Observational studyRheumatology (Oxford, England)2020

Outcomes of membranous and proliferative lupus nephritis - analysis of a single-centre cohort with more than 30 years of follow-up.

Filipa Farinha, Ruth J Pepper, Daniel G Oliveira, Thomas McDonnell, David A Isenberg, Anisur Rahman

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Not So Benign: Revisiting Pure Membranous Lupus Nephritis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Repeat biopsies in membranous lupus nephritis in the era of target antigen identification.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Diagnostic and therapy of lupus nephritis - 2023].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Filipa FarinhaCentre for Rheumatology, University College London.
Ruth J PepperCentre for Nephrology, University College London - Royal Free Campus, London, UK.
Daniel G OliveiraInternal Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Thomas McDonnellCentre for Rheumatology, University College London.
David A IsenbergCentre for Rheumatology, University College London.
Anisur RahmanCentre for Rheumatology, University College London.
University College London · GBCentro Hospitalar do Porto · PTThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P017371/1MRF_ MRF-057-0004-RG-MCDO-C0800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare membranous lupus nephritis (MLN) and proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN) with respect to survival, demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics; and to investigate predictors of renal and patient survival.

methodsSingle-centre retrospective observational study. Patients with biopsy-proven PLN, MLN and mixed lupus nephritis were included. Groups were compared using appropriate statistical tests and survival was analysed through the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate predictors of renal and patient survival.

resultsA total of 187 patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis (135 with PLN, 38 with MLN and 14 with mixed LN) were followed for up to 42 years (median 12 years). There was a higher proportion of MLN amongst Afro-Caribbeans than amongst Caucasians (31% vs 15%, P = 0.010). Patients with MLN had significantly lower anti-dsDNA antibodies (P = 0.001) and higher C3 levels (P = 0.018) at diagnosis. Cumulative renal survival rates at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years were 91, 81, 75 and 66% for PLN and 100, 97, 92 and 84% for MLN, respectively (P = 0.028). Cumulative patient survival at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years was 94, 86, 80 and 76%, with no difference between PLN and MLN. Urinary protein-creatinine ratio above 42 mg/mmol and eGFR below 76 ml/min/1.73 m2, one year after the diagnosis of LN, were the strongest predictors of progression to end-stage renal disease. eGFR below 77 ml/min/1.73 m2, at one year, development of end-stage renal disease and Afro-Caribbean ethnicity were associated with higher mortality.

conclusionPatients with MLN and PLN differ significantly regarding serological profiles and renal survival, suggesting different pathogenesis. Renal function at year one predicts renal and patient survival.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodiesBiomarkersComplement C3Disease ProgressionDNAFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidneyLupus NephritisMaleRegression AnalysisRetrospective StudiesAntibodiesBiomarkersComplement C3DNAlupus nephritisoutcomessurvivalsystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID32303057
PMCPMC7590413
OpenAlexW3017247917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.