Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32303054›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Risk and protective factors for post-traumatic stress among New Zealand military personnel: A cross sectional study.

Amy Richardson, Gagan Gurung, Ari Samaranayaka, Dianne Gardner, Brandon deGraaf, Emma H Wyeth, Sarah Derrett, Daniel Shepherd, David McBride

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Innovating through tradition: kava-Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Narratives of holistic mental health recovery in New Zealand Defence Force personnel.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mental health and resilience in the Irish defense forces during the COVID-19 global pandemic.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amy RichardsonInjury Prevention Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Gagan GurungDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Ari SamaranayakaCentre for Biostatistics, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Dianne GardnerSchool of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Brandon deGraafInjury Prevention Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Emma H WyethNgāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Sarah DerrettInjury Prevention Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Daniel ShepherdDepartment of Psychology, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
David McBrideInjury Prevention Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5531-7687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-traumatic stress (PTS) is prevalent among military personnel. Knowledge of the risk and protective factors associated with PTS in this population may assist with identifying personnel who would benefit from increased or targeted support.

aimsTo examine factors associated with PTS among New Zealand military personnel.

methodsFor this cross-sectional study, currently serving and retired military personnel were invited to complete a questionnaire. The questionnaire included a measure of PTS (the Military Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist; PCL-M), where scores ≥30 indicate the experience of significant PTS symptoms and scores ≥45 indicate a presumptive clinical diagnosis of post-traumatic stress. Potential risk and protective factors associated with PTS were examined using logistic regression modelling.

results1817 military personnel completed the questionnaire. PCL-M scores were ≥30 for 549 (30%) participants and ≥45 for 179 (10%) participants. Factors associated with higher PCL-M scores were trauma exposure, older age, male sex, and Māori ethnicity. Factors associated with lower PCL-M scores were greater length of service, psychological flexibility, and better quality sleep.

conclusionsPTS was found to be prevalent among New Zealand military personnel. The experience of trauma was strongly associated with PTS. However, factors such as psychological flexibility (the ability to adapt to changes in circumstances) and good sleep were protective, suggesting that these factors could be key targets for interventions designed to reduce PTS among military personnel in New Zealand.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelNew ZealandPrevalenceProtective FactorsRisk FactorsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32303054
PMCPMC7164978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.