ArticleGait & posture2020
Attentional prioritization in dual-task walking: Effects of stroke, environment, and instructed focus.
Article in Gait & posture, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute effects of virtual reality treadmill training on gait and cognition in older adults: A randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2022Trial
- Training structure matters: effects of simultaneous versus separate gait-cognitive training on executive function and dual-task interference in chronic stroke.Cognitive processing · 2026Article
- The Effects of Different Attentional Focus During Walking on Prefrontal Cortical Activation in Young Healthy Adults.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cortical hemodynamic responses in older stroke patients during a walking-based Stroop dual task: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Effects of Balance-Based Exergame Training With Variable Difficulty on Balance and Spatiotemporal Gait Outcomes in Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR serious games · 2025Article
- Comparative effects of arithmetic, speech, and motor dual-task walking on gait in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Efficient integration of personal factors into the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF): the importance of emotional and motivational aspects in goal pursuit.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Review
- How do drivers mitigate the effects of naturalistic visual complexity? : On attentional strategies and their implications under a change blindness protocol.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2023Article
- Cortical thickness is related to cognitive-motor automaticity and attention allocation in individuals with Alzheimer's disease: a regions of interest study.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Pilates and Cognitive Stimulation in Dual Task an Intervention Protocol to Improve Functional Abilities and Minimize the Rate of Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Postmenopausal Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Influence of Speech and Cognitive Load on Balance and Timed up and Go.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- A Novel Way of Measuring Dual-Task Interference: The Reliability and Construct Validity of the Dual-Task Effect Battery in Neurodegenerative Disease.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2022Article
- Greater Cognitive-Motor Interference in Individuals Post-Stroke During More Complex Motor Tasks.Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT · 2022Article
- Dual-Task Abilities During Activities Representative of Daily Life in Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors: A Pilot Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Dual-task interference as a function of varying motor and cognitive demands.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Virtual reality-based assessment of cognitive-locomotor interference in healthy young adults.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of high distraction, real-world environments on dual-task interference and flexibility of attentional prioritization during dual-task walking in people with stroke is unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does a real-world environment affect dual-task performance and flexible task prioritization during dual-task walking in adults with and without stroke?
methodsAdults with stroke (n = 29) as well as age-, gender-, and education-matched adults without stroke (n = 23) participated. Single and dual-task walking were examined in two different environments (lab hallway, hospital lobby). Two different dual-task combinations were assessed (Stroop-gait, speech-gait). Each dual-task was performed first without explicit instruction about task prioritization (no-priority) and then with gait-priority instruction and Stroop/speech-priority instruction in randomized order.
resultsPeople with stroke had significantly slower dual-task gait speed (Stroop only) in the lobby than the lab, but the effect was not clinically meaningful. Stroop reaction time for all participants was also slower in the lobby than the lab. All participants slowed their walking speed while generating spontaneous speech, but this effect was not influenced by environment. The dual-task attention allocation strategy was generally inflexible to instructed prioritization in adults with and without stroke in both environments, however, the volitional attention allocation strategy differed for the two dual-task conditions such that speech was prioritized in the speech-gait dual-task and gait appeared to be prioritized in the Stroop-gait dual-task. SIGNIFICANCE: Although dual-tasking slows walking speed and verbal responses to auditory stimuli in people with stroke, the effects are not considerably impacted by a more complex, distracting environment. Adults with and without stroke may have difficulty overriding the preferred attention allocation strategy during dual-task walking, especially for habitual dual-tasks such as walking while speaking. It may also be that the cognitive control strategy governing task prioritization is influenced by degree of cognitive engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.