Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32302515›Full record

ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2020

Cryopreservation of Viable Human Tissues: Renewable Resource for Viable Tissue, Cell Lines, and Organoid Development.

Andy He, Samantha Powell, Mason Kyle, Michael Rose, Edgar Masmila, Valeria Estrada, Jason K Sicklick, Alfredo Molinolo, Sharmeela Kaushal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biobanked Liver Organoids: A Roadmap for Precision Hepatology.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Cryopreservation of biological materials: applications and economic perspectives.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cryopreservation of neuroectoderm on a pillar plate andbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. 3D Tumor Models in Urology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Patient-Derived Organoids as a Model for Cancer Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andy HeBiorepository and Tissue Technology Shared Resources (BTTSR), Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Samantha PowellBiorepository and Tissue Technology Shared Resources (BTTSR), Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Mason KyleBiorepository and Tissue Technology Shared Resources (BTTSR), Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Michael RoseBiorepository and Tissue Technology Shared Resources (BTTSR), Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Edgar MasmilaBiorepository and Tissue Technology Shared Resources (BTTSR), Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Valeria EstradaBiorepository and Tissue Technology Shared Resources (BTTSR), Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Jason K SicklickBiorepository and Tissue Technology Shared Resources (BTTSR), Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Alfredo MolinoloBiorepository and Tissue Technology Shared Resources (BTTSR), Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Sharmeela KaushalBiorepository and Tissue Technology Shared Resources (BTTSR), Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Advanced Tissue (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of viable human tissues is critical to support translational research focused on personalized care. Most studies have relied on fresh frozen or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues for histopathology, genomics, and proteomics. Yet, basic, translational, and clinical research downstream assays such as tumor progression/invasion, patient-derived xenograft, organoids, immunoprofiling, and vaccine development still require viable tissue, which are time-sensitive and rare commodities. We describe the generation of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) cultures to validate a viable freeze cryopreservation technique as a standard method of highest quality specimen preservation. After surgical resection, specimens were minced, placed in CryoStor

Indexed as

BiomarkersCell Culture TechniquesCell LineCell SurvivalCryopreservationGenetic MarkersHumansOrganoidsProof of Concept StudySingle-Cell AnalysisTissue PreservationTumor Cells, CulturedBiomarkersGenetic Markerscell viabilitycryopreservationpatient-derived xenografttumor organoidsviable freeze

Identifiers

PMID32302515
PMCPMC7310214
OpenAlexW3016974741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.