Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32302388›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2020

Concept Analysis of Clinical Reasoning in Physical Therapist Practice.

Rob A B Oostendorp, J W Hans Elvers, Emiel Trijffel van

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rob A B OostendorpScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Manual Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group (www.paininmotion.be), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; and Practice Physiotherapy and Manual Therapy, Heeswijk-Dinther, The Netherlands.
J W Hans ElversDepartment of Public Health and Research, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Emiel Trijffel vanDepartment of Manual Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; SOMT University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands; Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. [Oostendorp RAB, Elvers JWH, van Trijffel E. Concept analysis of clinical reasoning in physical therapist practice Phys Ther. 2020;100:1-4.].

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy SpecialtyClinical Decision-MakingHumansMedical History TakingMedical RecordsNetherlandsPhysical ExaminationPhysical TherapistsPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality Indicators, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID32302388
PMCPMC7439222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.