Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32301841›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2020

Nebulized Poractant Alfa Reduces the Risk of Respiratory Failure at 72 Hours in Spontaneously Breathing Surfactant-Deficient Newborn Piglets.

Carmen Rey-Santano, Victoria E Mielgo, Miguel Angel Gomez-Solaetxe, Federico Bianco, Fabrizio Salomone, Begoña Loureiro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Trial of aerosolised surfactant for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen Rey-SantanoAnimal Research Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Victoria E MielgoAnimal Research Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Miguel Angel Gomez-SolaetxeMedical Devices Group, University of Basque Country, Portugalete, Bizkaia, Spain.
Federico BiancoChiesi Farmaceutici, R&D Department, Largo Belloli, Parma, Italy.
Fabrizio SalomoneChiesi Farmaceutici, R&D Department, Largo Belloli, Parma, Italy.
Begoña LoureiroNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
BioCruces Health research Institute · ESHospital de Cruces · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe have setup for the first time a long-term (72 hr) respiratory distress syndrome model in spontaneously breathing surfactant-deficient newborn piglets to investigate the continuous positive airway pressure failure rate with nebulized poractant alfa compared with that with the intubation surfactant extubation technique or continuous positive airway pressure only.

designProspective randomized animal study.

settingBiocruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute Animal Facility. SUBJECTS-

interventionsEighteen newborn piglets (n = 6/group) with surfactant-deficient respiratory distress syndrome were randomized to three continuous positive airway pressure-ventilated groups: 1) nebulized surfactant (poractant alfa 400 mg/kg) via a customized investigational eFlow-Neos vibrating membrane nebulizer system, 2) bolus administration using the Intubation Surfactant Extubation method (200 mg/kg), or 3) continuous positive airway pressure alone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPulmonary and hemodynamic variables were assessed at 6-hour intervals for 72 hours. Lung and brain histological analyses were performed. After bronchoalveolar lavages, piglets developed respiratory distress syndrome. Over the follow-up, both surfactant-treated groups had significantly better pulmonary outcomes than the continuous positive airway pressure alone group. Furthermore, unlike in the continuous positive airway pressure group, there were no cases of respiratory failure in either of the surfactant-treated groups.

conclusionsIn newborn piglets with respiratory distress syndrome, the nebulization of 400 mg/kg of poractant alfa using a customized investigational eFlow-Neos nebulizer was found to be safe and effective in reducing the risk of respiratory failure in the 72 hours after treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiological ProductsBronchoalveolar LavageContinuous Positive Airway PressureDisease Models, AnimalDrug Administration RoutesDrug Administration ScheduleHumansNebulizers and VaporizersPhospholipidsProspective StudiesPulmonary SurfactantsRandom AllocationRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornSwineBiological ProductsPhospholipidsporactant alfaPulmonary Surfactants

Identifiers

PMID32301841
PMCPMC7237025
OpenAlexW3016622983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.