ArticleCritical care medicine2020
Nebulized Poractant Alfa Reduces the Risk of Respiratory Failure at 72 Hours in Spontaneously Breathing Surfactant-Deficient Newborn Piglets.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Preclinical Assessment of Nebulized Surfactant Delivered through Neonatal High Flow Nasal Cannula Respiratory Support.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Trial of aerosolised surfactant for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2022Article
- Aerosol Delivery of Lung Surfactant and Nasal CPAP in the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Surfactant nebulization therapy during NIPPV ventilation in surfactant-deficient newborn piglets.Pediatric pulmonology · 2021Article
- Aerosol drug delivery to spontaneously-breathing preterm neonates: lessons learned.Respiratory research · 2021Review
- A Compartment-Based Mathematical Model for Studying Convective Aerosol Transport in Newborns Receiving Nebulized Drugs during Noninvasive Respiratory Support.Pharmaceutics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe have setup for the first time a long-term (72 hr) respiratory distress syndrome model in spontaneously breathing surfactant-deficient newborn piglets to investigate the continuous positive airway pressure failure rate with nebulized poractant alfa compared with that with the intubation surfactant extubation technique or continuous positive airway pressure only.
designProspective randomized animal study.
settingBiocruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute Animal Facility. SUBJECTS-
interventionsEighteen newborn piglets (n = 6/group) with surfactant-deficient respiratory distress syndrome were randomized to three continuous positive airway pressure-ventilated groups: 1) nebulized surfactant (poractant alfa 400 mg/kg) via a customized investigational eFlow-Neos vibrating membrane nebulizer system, 2) bolus administration using the Intubation Surfactant Extubation method (200 mg/kg), or 3) continuous positive airway pressure alone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsPulmonary and hemodynamic variables were assessed at 6-hour intervals for 72 hours. Lung and brain histological analyses were performed. After bronchoalveolar lavages, piglets developed respiratory distress syndrome. Over the follow-up, both surfactant-treated groups had significantly better pulmonary outcomes than the continuous positive airway pressure alone group. Furthermore, unlike in the continuous positive airway pressure group, there were no cases of respiratory failure in either of the surfactant-treated groups.
conclusionsIn newborn piglets with respiratory distress syndrome, the nebulization of 400 mg/kg of poractant alfa using a customized investigational eFlow-Neos nebulizer was found to be safe and effective in reducing the risk of respiratory failure in the 72 hours after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.