Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32301836›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical gastroenterology

Improving Communication in Outpatient Consultations in People With Cirrhosis: The Development of a Question Prompt List (QPL).

Joseph T S Low, Sarah Davis, Lynda Greenslade, Cathy Carroll, Rachel Craig, Jo Wilson, Jennifer-Louise Clancy, Aileen Marshall, Douglas Thorburn, Patrick Stone

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph T S LowMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London.
Sarah DavisMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London.
Lynda GreensladeSheila Sherlock Liver Unit, Royal Free Hospital & University College London.
Cathy CarrollPalliative Care Department, Royal Free London NHS Trust.
Rachel CraigPalliative Care Department, Royal Free London NHS Trust.
Jo WilsonPalliative Care Department, Royal Free London NHS Trust.
Jennifer-Louise ClancySheila Sherlock Liver Unit, Royal Free Hospital & University College London.
Aileen MarshallSheila Sherlock Liver Unit, Royal Free Hospital & University College London.
Douglas ThorburnSheila Sherlock Liver Unit, Royal Free Hospital & University College London.
Patrick StoneMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London.
University College London · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBMarie Curie · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-FCH-18-UMarie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-U
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsLiver health professionals have difficulty discussing liver cirrhosis and its prognosis with patients and families. Question Prompt Lists (QPLs), which are evidence-based lists of "recommended questions," may improve communication but need to be designed specifically for the target population. This study aimed to develop and pilot a QPL for patients with cirrhosis.

methodsA mixed-methods design in 3 phases. In phase 1 (item generation), potential questions for inclusion in the QPL were identified from 3 sources-a scoping literature review; an online survey; and interviews with patients, family members, and health professionals. In phase 2 (QPL construction), a multidisciplinary expert panel finalized the selection of questions and the format of the QPL. In phase 3 (pilot study), the QPL was assessed for acceptability and feasibility in a hepatology outpatient clinic population.

resultsFrom 258 topics initially identified, 30 questions were included in the first draft of the QPL. After review by a multidisciplinary expert panel including patients, the QPL was reduced to 22 questions. In the pilot study, 133/215 eligible patients consented to participate, although only 67/133 used the QPL in their clinic appointment. Among those who used the QPL, all questions were asked at least once. The most commonly asked question related to life expectancy. Most participants expressed support for the content of the QPL.

conclusionsA QPL, suitable for use in patients with liver cirrhosis attending hepatology outpatient clinics, has been developed and piloted. The QPL seems to be feasible to use and acceptable to patients and clinicians. Further work is needed to evaluate its effectiveness and to determine optimum delivery in clinical practice.

Indexed as

OutpatientsPhysician-Patient RelationsCommunicationHumansLiver CirrhosisPatient ParticipationPilot ProjectsReferral and ConsultationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32301836
PMCPMC7664949
OpenAlexW3017063915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.