SynthesisRadiology2020
Diagnostic Performance of CT and Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05279378 (Correlation of Lung Ultrasonography With Chest CT Findings in Cancer Patients With COVID-19 Viral Pneumonia, an Observational Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 308 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Correlation of Lung Ultrasonography With Chest CT Findings in Cancer Patients With COVID-19 Viral Pneumonia, an Observational Study
Who cites it
308 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Double-Negative Results Matter: A Reevaluation of Sensitivities for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swabs.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Pooled it
- Computed tomography severity score as a predictor of disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of CO-RADS for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2022Pooled it
- Do COVID-19 CT features vary between patients from within and outside mainland China? Findings from a meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- An Umbrella Review With Meta-Analysis of Chest Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of COVID-19: Considerations for Trauma Patient Management.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Deep Learning Detection of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Academic radiology · 2021Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of the clinical performance of commercial SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid and antibody tests up to 22 August 2020.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2021Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of chest computed tomography imaging for COVID-19 based on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction: a meta-analysis.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2021Pooled it
- Diagnostic features of SARS-COVID-2-positive patients: A rapid review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical nursing · 2021Pooled it
- Chest CT abnormalities in COVID-19: a systematic review.International journal of medical sciences · 2021Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- The Limited Sensitivity of Chest Computed Tomography Relative to Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Infection: A Systematic Review on COVID-19 Diagnostics.Investigative radiology · 2020Pooled it
- Weight loss treatment for COVID-19 in patients with NCDs: a pilot prospective clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Diagnostic Performance of Chest CT for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Individuals with or without COVID-19 Symptoms.Radiology · 2021Trial
- Radiation Dose Estimation and Lifetime Attributable Risk of Radiation-Induced Cancer from Chest CT in COVID-19 Patients.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Article
- Advancing thyroid diagnosis: integrating AI-driven CAD framework with numerical data and ultrasound images.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Comparison of different T cell assays for the retrospective determination of SARS-CoV-2 infection.The Journal of general virology · 2024Article
- Article
- A Literature Review on the Relative Diagnostic Accuracy of Chest CT Scans versus RT-PCR Testing for COVID-19 Diagnosis.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
- Potential diagnostic application of a novel deep learning- based approach for COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2024Article
248 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Recent studies have suggested that chest CT scans could be used as a primary screening or diagnostic tool for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in epidemic areas. Purpose To perform a meta-analysis to evaluate diagnostic performance measures, including predictive values of chest CT and initial reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Materials and Methods Medline and Embase were searched from January 1, 2020, to April 3, 2020, for studies on COVID-19 that reported the sensitivity, specificity, or both of CT scans, RT-PCR assays, or both. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated by using random-effects models. The actual prevalence (ie, the proportion of confirmed patients among those tested) in eight countries was obtained from web sources, and the predictive values were calculated. Meta-regression was performed to reveal the effect of potential explanatory factors on the diagnostic performance measures. Results The pooled sensitivity was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91%, 96%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.