Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32301177›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020

Specific absorption rate implications of within-scan patient head motion for ultra-high field MRI.

Emre Kopanoglu, Cem M Deniz, M Arcan Erturk, Richard G Wise

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MRI and Implant Safety at Low-Field and Ultralow-Field Strengths.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Safety for Human MR Scanners at 7T.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Correcting inter-scan motion artifacts in quantitative RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Neuroimaging at 7 Tesla: a pictorial narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Review
  10. Rigid motion-resolvedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Emre KopanogluCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-4441
Cem M DenizDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-8809-5945
M Arcan ErturkRestorative Therapies Group, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-8048-9296
Richard G WiseCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-2144
Cardiff University · GBMedtronic (United States) · USNYU Langone Health · USUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Hersh Chandarana · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Medical Research Council MR/M008932/1NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigates the implications of all degrees of freedom of within-scan patient head motion on patient safety.

methodsElectromagnetic simulations were performed by displacing and/or rotating a virtual body model inside an 8-channel transmit array to simulate 6 degrees of freedom of motion. Rotations of up to 20° and displacements of up to 20 mm including off-axis axial/coronal translations were investigated, yielding 104 head positions. Quadrature excitation, RF shimming, and multi-spoke parallel-transmit excitation pulses were designed for axial slice-selection at 7T, for seven slices across the head. Variation of whole-head specific absorption rate (SAR) and 10-g averaged local SAR of the designed pulses, as well as the change in the maximum eigenvalue (worst-case pulse) were investigated by comparing off-center positions to the central position.

resultsIn their respective worst-cases, patient motion increased the eigenvalue-based local SAR by 42%, whole-head SAR by 60%, and the 10-g averaged local SAR by 210%. Local SAR was observed to be more sensitive to displacements along right-left and anterior-posterior directions than displacement in the superior-inferior direction and rotation.

conclusionThis is the first study to investigate the effect of all 6 degrees of freedom of motion on safety of practical pulses. Although the results agree with the literature for overlapping cases, the results demonstrate higher increases (up to 3.1-fold) in local SAR for off-axis displacement in the axial plane, which had received less attention in the literature. This increase in local SAR could potentially affect the local SAR compliance of subjects, unless realistic within-scan patient motion is taken into account during pulse design.

Indexed as

HeadMagnetic Resonance ImagingComputer SimulationHumansPhantoms, ImagingRadionuclide Imagingparallel transmitpatient motionpatient safetyRF pulse designspecific absorption rateultra-high field MRI

Identifiers

PMID32301177
PMCPMC7396298
OpenAlexW3013091935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.