Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32301170›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2021

The Dutch Individualised Care Scale for patients and nurses - a psychometric validation study.

Sofie Theys, Ann Van Hecke, Reinier Akkermans, Maud Heinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sofie TheysFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care - University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8522-063X
Ann Van HeckeFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care - University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-7159
Reinier AkkermansIQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0592-4563
Maud HeinenNursing Science and Allied Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7536-1327

Funding

the Federal Public Service for health, food chain safety and environmentUniversitair Ziekenhuis Gent
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTranslating and psychometrically assessing the Individualised Care Scale (ICS) for patients and nurses for the Flemish and Dutch healthcare context.

backgroundIndividualised care interventions have positive effects on health outcomes. However, there are no valid and reliable instruments for evaluating individualised care for the Flemish and Dutch healthcare context.

designPsychometric validation study. SETTING AND

participantsIn Flemish hospitals, data were collected between February and June 2016, and in Dutch hospitals, data were collected between December 2014 and May 2015. Nurses with direct patient contact and a working experience of minimum 6 months on the wards could participate. Patient inclusion criteria were being an adult, being mentally competent, having an expected hospital stay of minimum 1 day, and being able to speak and read the Dutch language. In total, 845 patients and 569 nurses were included.

methodsThe ICS was translated into Dutch using a forward-backward translation process. Minimal linguistic adaptations to the Dutch ICS were made to use the scale as a Flemish equivalent. Omega, Cronbach's Alpha, mean inter-item correlations and standardised subscale correlations established the reliability and confirmatory factor analysis the construct validity of the ICS.

resultsInternal consistency using Omega (Cronbach's Alpha) ranged from 0.83 to 0.96 (0.82-0.95) for the ICS-Nurse and from 0.88 to 0.96 (0.87-0.96) for the ICS-Patient. Fit indices of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good model fit, except for the root mean square error of approximation, which indicated only moderate model fit.

conclusionThe Dutch version of the ICS showed acceptable psychometric performance, supporting its use for the Dutch and Flemish healthcare context. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Knowledge of nurses' and patients' perceptions on individualised care will aid to target areas in the Dutch and Flemish healthcare context in which work needs to be undertaken to provide individualised nursing care.

Indexed as

LanguageNursesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingindividualised careIndividualised Care Scalenursingpsychometricsreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID32301170
PMCPMC7984034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.