Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32301052›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2020

The impact of donor urine chemical toxicology analysis on outcomes of kidney transplantation.

Karim M Soliman, Christopher Molini, Tessa Novick, Steven Menez, Tibor Fülöp, Edward Kraus, Blaithin A McMahon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Karim M SolimanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical University South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Christopher MoliniNephrology Associates, Church Street, Nashville, TN, USA.
Tessa NovickDell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
Steven MenezDell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
Tibor FülöpDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical University South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Edward KrausComprehensive Renal Transplantation Unit, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Blaithin A McMahonDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical University South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. mcmahonb@gmail.com.
The University of Texas at Austin · USCairo University · EGJohns Hopkins University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USNashville Oncology Associates · USRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcceptance of organs from acute chemical intoxicated donors remains controversial and outcomes are insufficiently explored.

methodsThis is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of 484 patients undergoing deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). We assessed the association of positive urine drug screen before transplantation with cohort statistics, delayed graft function (DGF), and graft outcomes at 2 years. Multiple logistical regression (MLR) analysis was used to assess the odds ratio for DGF.

resultsOf 484 random DDKTs performed at our institution between January 2010 and October 2015, 280 deceased kidney donors were current drug users. Mean age was 35.4 (15) years, 39% male, 61% were African Americans, and 38.2% had more than one test positive. The main chemical toxins detectable in donor urine were alcohol, heroin, opioid/methadone, cocaine, marijuana, benzodiazepines, methamphetamine, ecstasy, and LSD. Single and multiple urine chemical toxicology of kidney donors did not have a significant effect on KT outcomes of DGF and graft failure during a median follow-up (P for odds ratios > 0.05).

conclusionsThe use of deceased donor kidney grafts from donors with positive urine chemical toxicology may be a worthwhile method of increasing the availability of scarce donor kidney organs as such exposure to illicit drug(s) is not associated with major adverse transplant outcomes.

Indexed as

Donor SelectionKidney TransplantationAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSubstance-Related DisordersTreatment OutcomeUrinalysisYoung AdultDonorDrugs of abuseOutcomesRenal transplantationToxicologyUrine drug

Identifiers

PMID32301052
OpenAlexW3017260216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.