Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32301002›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2020

Surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistula: a retrospective analysis of 52 consecutive patients.

G Bislenghi, L Verstraeten, I Verlinden, F Castiglione, K Debaets, F Van der Aa, S Fieuws, A Wolthuis, A D'Hoore, S Joniau

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Advance in research of treatment and prognosis of iatrogenic rectourethral fistula.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G BislenghiDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. gabriele.bislenghi@uzleuven.be.
L VerstraetenDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
I VerlindenDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
F CastiglioneDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
K DebaetsDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
F Van der AaDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
S FieuwsInteruniversity Center for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven, University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
A WolthuisDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
A D'HooreDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
S JoniauDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcquired rectourethral fistula (RUF) is an uncommon complication mostly resulting from surgery or radiation. Standardization of the surgical management is lacking. The aim of this study was to report our experience with surgery for RUF.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained clinical database. The surgical strategy was tailored to complexity of RUF, presence of sepsis, history of radiation and residual urinary/fecal functionality. Outcomes measured were RUF closure and permanent fecal/urinary diversion. Impact of radiotherapy was also assessed.

resultsBetween November 2002 and January 2019, 52 patients were identified (100% males). Median follow-up was 10.5 (0.5-16.8) years. Three patients had RUF closure after conservative management. The remaining 49 patients had a total of 76 procedures. The cumulative closure rate after the first, second and third attempt was 55.1%, 85.7% and 95.9%, respectively. Fistula closure together with preservation of the fecal and urinary function was achieved in 49%, 65.3% and 67.3% after the first, second and third repair, respectively. The overall success rate for transanal, transperineal, restorative transabdominal and non-restorative transabdominal procedures was 35.7%, 64.3%, 57.1% and 94.1%, respectively. A significantly higher rate of urinary/intestinal stomas was observed in the irradiated vs non-irradiated patients (84.2% vs 42.4%; p = 0.004).

conclusionsSurgery ensured healing in 96% of the patients. Radiotherapy led to higher rate of permanent urinary/fecal diversion. Nearly all irradiated patients who had transabdominal repair end up with a definitive stoma. When transperineal repair with gracilis flap interposition was used, the rate of fistula closure approached 90%. A treatment algorithm is proposed.

Indexed as

Rectal FistulaUrethral DiseasesUrinary FistulaHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSurgical FlapsColorectal surgeryProstate cancerRadiotherapyRectourethral fistula

Identifiers

PMID32301002
OpenAlexW3017010913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.