ArticleCurrent microbiology2020
Seasonal Variation Influence Endophytic Actinobacterial Communities of Medicinal Plants from Tropical Deciduous Forest of Meghalaya and Characterization of Their Plant Growth-Promoting Potentials.
Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antifungal Activities of Compounds Produced by Newly IsolatedAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Undescribed Metabolites from an ActinobacteriaMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Characterization and purification of esterase from Cellulomonas fimi DB19 isolated from Zanthoxylum armatum with its possible role in diesel biodegradation.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Seasonal variation and tissues specificity of endophytic fungi of Dillenia indica L. and their extracellular enzymatic activity.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Secondary Metabolites with Anti-Inflammatory Activities from an Actinobacteria Herbidospora daliensisMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Microbiome of the Medicinal PlantsFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The endophytic actinobacteria constitute a diverse community which has vast potential importance that may be exploited in pharmaceutical, agricultural, and biotechnological industries. However, the effects of seasonal changes on distribution of endophytic actinobacteria in medicinal plants of Meghalaya are largely uncharacterized. Here, we investigated host and seasonal influence on diversity of endophytic actinobacteria residing in roots of six medicinal plant species of Meghalaya. A total of 493 cultivable endophytic actinobacterial isolates representing 41 species were obtained from root segments of six plant species which had been collected during four different seasons of 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. Among the host plant species, maximum actinobacterial colonization was observed in Costus speciosus and minimum in Potentilla fulgens. In regard to seasons, the highest actinobacterial colonization and relative abundance were observed during summer season and least was recorded during the winter season. It was ascertained that though endophytic actinobacteria have varying capacity to colonize in different plant species during the seasons, colonization is not found to be species-specific. Culture-independent attempt also inferred that actinobacterial community varied amongst the six medicinal plants during the different seasons. Hence, seasons are influential factors in the colonization capacity of endophytic actinobacterial community. Furthermore, plant growth-promoting activities were recorded in 34.15% of the isolates. Hence, these results indicate that endophytic actinobacteria from the selected medicinal plants also represent an important source of plant growth-promoting bioactive metabolites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32300926What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.