Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32300899›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2020

Development of a FRET-Based Assay for Analysis of mAbs Internalization and Processing by Dendritic Cells in Preclinical Immunogenicity Risk Assessment.

Yi Wen, Suntara Cahya, Wei Zeng, Joanne Lin, Xiaoli Wang, Ling Liu, Laurent Malherbe, Robert Siegel, Andrea Ferrante, Arunan Kaliyaperumal

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Reducing Immunogenicity by Design: Approaches to Minimize Immunogenicity of Monoclonal Antibodies.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. RapidmAbs
    Article
  13. Article
  14. mAbs
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yi WenLilly Biotechnology Center, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, 10290 Campus Point Drive, San Diego, California, 92121, USA.
Suntara CahyaLilly Biotechnology Center, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, 10290 Campus Point Drive, San Diego, California, 92121, USA.
Wei ZengLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46285, USA.
Joanne LinLilly Biotechnology Center, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, 10290 Campus Point Drive, San Diego, California, 92121, USA.
Xiaoli WangLilly Biotechnology Center, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, 10290 Campus Point Drive, San Diego, California, 92121, USA.
Ling LiuLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46285, USA.
Laurent MalherbeLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46285, USA.
Robert SiegelLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46285, USA.
Andrea FerranteLilly Biotechnology Center, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, 10290 Campus Point Drive, San Diego, California, 92121, USA.
Arunan KaliyaperumalLilly Biotechnology Center, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, 10290 Campus Point Drive, San Diego, California, 92121, USA. kaliyaperumal_arunan@lilly.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies (TE-ADA) pose a major challenge to the development of biotherapeutics. The antidrug antibody responses are highly orchestrated and involve many types of immune cells and biological processes. Biological drug internalization and processing by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are two initial and critical steps in the cascade of events leading to T cell-dependent ADA production. The assays thus far described in literature to evaluate immunogenicity potential/risk as a function of APC activity mainly focus on internalization of labeled drug candidates in vitro. Herein, we describe a high-throughput Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based assay for assessing both internalization and processing using CD14+ monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) as APCs. Antigen-binding fragment F(ab')2 against IgG fragment crystallizable gamma (Fcγ) was labeled with the activatable FRET pair TAMRA-QSY7 as a universal probe for antibodies and proteins with a fragment crystallizable (Fc) domain. The assay was qualified using six mAbs of known clinical immunogenicity and one IgG1 isotype antibody using Design of Experiment (DoE). Correlation analysis of internalization and clinical immunogenicity data showed that this FRET-based internalization assay was able to detect clinically immunogenic antibodies. This method provides a tool for analyzing/screening the immunogenicity risk of biological candidates by assessing one of the critical components of the ADA formation process within the broader context of an immunogenicity risk assessment strategy.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationImmunogenetic PhenomenaMolecular ProbesAntibodies, MonoclonalDendritic CellsFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferLysosomesRisk AssessmentAntibodies, MonoclonalMolecular ProbesDendritic cellsDesign of experimentFRETImmunogenicityInternalization and processing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.