Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32300893›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2021

A scoping review and assessment of essential elements of shared decision-making of parent-involved interventions in child and adolescent mental health.

Shaun Liverpool, Brent Pereira, Daniel Hayes, Miranda Wolpert, Julian Edbrooke-Childs

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Shared Decision-Making About Returning to Sport After Recovery From Pediatric Concussion: Clinician Perspectives.Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Youth Perspectives on 'Highly Personalised and Measurement-Based Care': Qualitative Co-Design of Education Materials.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Parents' perspectives on user participation and shared decision-making in adolescents' inpatient mental healthcare.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shaun LiverpoolEvidence-Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, 4-8 Rodney Street, London, UK. shaun.liverpool.14@ucl.ac.uk.
Brent PereiraThe Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Chicago, USA.
Daniel HayesEvidence-Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, 4-8 Rodney Street, London, UK.
Miranda WolpertUniversity College London, London, UK.
Julian Edbrooke-ChildsEvidence-Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, 4-8 Rodney Street, London, UK.
University College London · GBAnna Freud Centre · GBThe Chicago School of Professional Psychology · US

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 722561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parents play a critical role in child and adolescent mental health care and treatment. With the increasing implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) across health settings, there is a growing need to understand the decision support interventions used to promote SDM in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS). The overall aim of this review is to identify and examine the existing decision support interventions available for parents. A broad search was conducted using the key concepts "shared decision-making", "parents" and "child and adolescent mental health". Five electronic databases were searched: PsycInfo, Embase, Medline, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. In addition to these relevant databases, we searched the Ottawa's Inventory of Decision Aids, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario website, Google, Google Play and known CAMHS' websites. The search identified 23 interventions available for use with parents. These interventions targeted parents providing care for children with ADHD, ASD, emotional and behavioural problems including depression (EBD), self-harm or universal mental health care. Various modalities including face-to-face, digital and paper-based versions were adopted. The majority of the interventions were able to "present options" (87%) and "discuss the pros and cons" (83%) of treatment. Time, accessibility and appropriateness of the intervention emerged as factors influencing usage and implementation of interventions. Our findings suggest that SDM interventions involving parents have been implemented differently across various presenting mental health difficulties in CAMHS. This review brings awareness of existing parent-involved interventions and has implications for the development, implementation and usage of new interventions.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPatient ParticipationAdolescentChildDecision MakingEmotionsHumansParents

Identifiers

PMID32300893
PMCPMC8440241
OpenAlexW3016934589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.