Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32300885›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2020

Lift and VAAFT for high trans-sphincteric anal fistula: a single center retrospective analysis.

M La Torre, G Lisi, E D'Agostino, M Boccuzzi, M Campanelli, M Varriale, S M Tierno

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Evidence outside the box: Minimally invasive treatment for anal fistula.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M La TorreDepartment of Surgery, UPMC University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (Salvator Mundi International Hospital) and Villa Tiberia Hospital, Rome, Italy.
G LisiDepartment of General Surgery, Coloproctology and Pelvic Floor Disease Unit, San Sebastiano Martire Hospital, Frascati, Italy. giolimas06@yahoo.it.
E D'AgostinoDepartment of General Surgery, Coloproctology and Pelvic Floor Disease Unit, San Sebastiano Martire Hospital, Frascati, Italy.
M BoccuzziDepartment of General Surgery, Coloproctology and Pelvic Floor Disease Unit, San Sebastiano Martire Hospital, Frascati, Italy.
M CampanelliMinimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
M VarrialeDepartment of Surgery, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, Rome, Italy.
S M TiernoDepartment of Surgery, Ospedale GM Vannini, Istituto Figlie di San Camillo, Rome, Italy.
Ospedale Sandro Pertini · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe management of complex anal fistulas remains a challenge, mainly due to the considerable risk of incontinence. We compared LIFT and VAAFT in the treatment of complex anal fistulas in terms of healing time, recurrence, continence, morbidity, and postoperative pain, focusing also on patients with local abscess at the time of surgery.

methodsWe include all patients with high trans-sphincteric anal fistula even with abscess at the time of surgery. Anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, Cleveland Clinic fecal incontinence score, VAS score, and number of previous fistula treatment were recorded. The clinical examination defined healing, insufficiency or recurrence of the fistula.

resultsFifty-four consecutive patients are undergoing surgery: 26 patients underwent LIFT and 28 underwent VAAFT. During the 18 months of follow-up there were no differences in terms of AM, CCFIS and VAS scores. Days of healing, failure, and recurrence rate were comparable in both groups. The subgroup of patients with local abscess undergoing LIFT showed worse results in terms of failure and recurrence rate (p < 0.05).

conclusionsBoth techniques are safe and effective and can offer long-term benefits. LIFT should not be used as a first treatment in high trans-sphincteric fistula with perianal abscess.

Indexed as

AbscessAnal CanalCutaneous FistulaFecal IncontinenceFollow-Up StudiesHumansLigationManometryPostoperative PainRectal FistulaRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment FailureVideo-Assisted SurgeryWound HealingAbscessFistulaLIFTRecurrenceTrans-SphinctericVAAFT

Identifiers

PMID32300885
OpenAlexW3016332528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.