Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32300825›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2020

Genome-wide association mapping of tan spot resistance in a worldwide collection of durum wheat.

Nelomie Galagedara, Yuan Liu, Jason Fiedler, Gongjun Shi, Shiaoman Chiao, Steven S Xu, Justin D Faris, Xuehui Li, Zhaohui Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome-wide association mapping of tan spot resistance in a modified NAM population derived from synthetic hexaploid wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nelomie GalagedaraDepartment of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA.
Yuan LiuDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA.
Jason FiedlerUSDA-ARS Cereal Crops Research Unit, Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, Fargo, ND, 58102, USA.
Gongjun ShiDepartment of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA.
Shiaoman ChiaoUSDA-ARS Cereal Crops Research Unit, Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, Fargo, ND, 58102, USA.
Steven S XuUSDA-ARS Cereal Crops Research Unit, Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, Fargo, ND, 58102, USA.
Justin D FarisUSDA-ARS Cereal Crops Research Unit, Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, Fargo, ND, 58102, USA.
Xuehui LiDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA. Xuehui.li@ndsu.edu.
Zhaohui LiuDepartment of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA. zhh.liu@ndsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8106-9186

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project 02234North Dakota State Board of Agricultural Research and Education 0000North Dakota Wheat Commission 0000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageResistance to tan spot in durum wheat involves race-nonspecific QTL and necrotrophic insensitivity gene. Tan spot, caused by the necrotrophic fungus Pyrenophoratritici-repentis, is a major foliar disease on all cultivated wheat crops worldwide. Compared to common wheat, much less work has been done to investigate the genetic basis of tan spot resistance in durum. Here, we conducted disease evaluations, necrotrophic effector (NE) sensitivity assays and a genome-wide association study using a collection of durum accessions. The durum panel segregated for the reaction to disease inoculations and NE infiltrations with eighteen accessions being highly resistant to all races and most of them insensitive to both PtrToxA and PtrToxB. Over 65,000SNP markers were developed from genotyping-by-sequencing for the association mapping. As expected, sensitivity to PtrToxA and PtrToxB was mapped to the chromosome arms 5BL and 2BS, respectively. For the fungal inoculations, a quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome 3B was associated with resistance to all races and likely corresponds to the race-nonspecific resistance QTL previously identified in common wheat. The Tsn1locus was not significantly associated with tan spot caused by the PtrToxA-producing isolates Pti2 and 86-124, but the Tsc2 locus was significantly associated with tan spot caused by the PtrToxB-producing isolate DW5. Another QTL on chromosome arm 1AS was associated with tan spot caused by the PtrToxC-producing isolate Pti2 and likely corresponds to the Tsc1 locus. Additional QTL for specific races was identified on chromosome 1B and 3B. Our work highlights the complexity of genetic resistance to tan spot and further confirms that the Ptr ToxA-Tsn1 interaction plays no significant role in disease development in tetraploid wheat.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAscomycotaChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantDisease ResistanceGenes, PlantGenetic Association StudiesGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersGenotypePhenotypePlant DiseasesQuantitative Trait LociTriticumGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.