Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32300822›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2020

[Individual revision arthroplasty of the knee joint].

Max Ettinger, Henning Windhagen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Max EttingerKlinik für Orthopädie im Annastift, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Anna von Borries Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. Max@ettinger.info.
Henning WindhagenKlinik für Orthopädie im Annastift, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Anna von Borries Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With increasing numbers of primary knee arthroplasties, the relevance and frequency of prosthesis replacement operations are increasing with a time lag. Two-zone anchoring is important. Due to bony defects, the articular surface can often no longer be used as a possible anchoring zone, so the fixation must take place in the metaphyseal and diaphyseal area of the bone. If, for various reasons, the defect is too pronounced for regular care, individually-manufactured implants can be used. These are produced on the basis of a preoperative CT as part of a two-stage change using industrial 3D printers and so-called additive manufacturing.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisProsthesis FailureReoperationHumansKnee JointProsthesis Design3D PrintingDiaphysisEndoprosthesisRevision surgeryTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.