Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32300737›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2020

Global variation in the prevalence of bullying victimisation amongst adolescents: Role of peer and parental supports.

Tuhin Biswas, James G Scott, Kerim Munir, Hannah J Thomas, M Mamun Huda, Md Mehedi Hasan, Tim David de Vries, Janeen Baxter, Abdullah A Mamun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Impact of resin infiltration on self-reported bullying and OHRQoL in children with MIH: a single-arm clinical trial.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tuhin BiswasInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
James G ScottQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Qld, 4006.
Kerim MunirDevelopmental Medicine Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Hannah J ThomasQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Qld, 4006.
M Mamun HudaInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Md Mehedi HasanInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Tim David de VriesUtrecht University, Netherlands.
Janeen BaxterInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Abdullah A MamunInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

NCD-LIFESPAN Global Mental Health/Developmental Disorders Research Training InitiD43TW009680 · FIC · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MUNIR, KERIM M · 2014 to 2018
$1.3M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBullying victimisation is a global public health problem that has been predominantly studied in high income countries. This study aimed to estimate the population level prevalence of bullying victimisation and its association with peer and parental supports amongst adolescents across low and middle income to high income countries (LMIC-HICs).

methodsData were drawn from the Global School-based Student Health Survey of school children aged 12-17 years, between 2003 and 2015, in 83 LMIC-HICs in the six World Health Organization (WHO) regions. We estimated the weighted prevalence of bullying victimisation at country, region and global level. We used multiple binary logistic regression models to estimate the adjusted association of age, gender, socioeconomic status, and parental support and peer support, and country level variables (GDP and government expenditure on education) with adolescent bullying victimisation.

findingsOf the 317,869 adolescents studied, 151,036 (48%) were males, and 166,833 (52%) females. The pooled prevalence of bullying victimisation on one or more days in the past 30 days amongst adolescents aged 12-17 years was 30·5% (95% CI: 30·2-31·0%). The highest prevalence was observed in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (45·1%, 44·3-46·0%) and African region (43·5%, 43·0-44·3%), and the lowest in Europe (8·4%, 8·0-9·0%). Bullying victimisation was associated with male gender (OR: 1·21; 1·11-1·32), below average socio-economic status (OR: 1·47, 1·35-1·61), and younger age (OR: 1·11, 1·0-1·24). Higher levels of peer support (0·51, 0·46-0·57), higher levels of parental support (e.g., understanding children's problems (OR: 0·85, 0·77-0·95), and knowing the importance of free time spent with children (OR: 0·77, 0·70-0·85)), were significantly associated with a reduced risk of bullying victimisation. INTERPRETATIONS: Bullying victimisation is prevalent amongst adolescents globally, particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean and African regions. Parental and peer supports are protective factors against bullying victimisation. A reduction in bullying victimisation may be facilitated by family and peer based interventions aimed at increasing social connectedness of adolescents.

Identifiers

PMID32300737
PMCPMC7152826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.