Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32300735›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2020

Efficacy and safety of methotrexate in the management of inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

Ole Haagen Nielsen, Casper Steenholdt, Carsten Bogh Juhl, Gerhard Rogler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. The roles and heterogeneity of CD8International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Choosing Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. A review of the therapeutic management of Crohn's disease.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ole Haagen NielsenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Casper SteenholdtDepartment of Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carsten Bogh JuhlResearch Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Gerhard RoglerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
University of Copenhagen · DKHerlev Hospital · DKUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe therapeutic role of methotrexate (MTX) for management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unclear.

methodsWe systematically reviewed randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of MTX for induction and maintenance of remission in IBD until January 2020 in accordance with PROSPERO protocol (#CRD42018115047). Relative risk (RR) of maintenance of remission, induction of remission, endoscopic disease activity, and adverse events were combined in a meta-analysis.

findingsMTX monotherapy was not superior to placebo for induction of clinical remission in Crohn's disease (CD). However, MTX was superior to placebo in maintaining clinical remission of CD. Concomitant therapy with MTX and the TNF inhibitor infliximab (IFX) was not superior to IFX monotherapy in CD. In ulcerative colitis (UC), MTX monotherapy was not superior to placebo neither for induction of clinical remission, nor for maintenance of clinical remission. MTX did not result in superior endoscopic outcomes during induction or maintenance therapy compared with placebo. Regarding adverse events (AEs), our meta-analysis on CD studies showed a significantly higher risk of AEs when comparing MTX versus placebo in studies investigating induction of remission, but not in maintenance of remission. In UC, no such differences in AEs between MTX or placebo were observed.

interpretationCurrent data support the efficacy of parenteral MTX monotherapy for maintenance of clinical remission in CD. MTX is not confirmed to be effective for treatment of UC or for induction of remission in CD. No evidence supports concomitant MTX to improve efficacy of IFX (no other biologics investigated).

Indexed as

Crohn's diseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseMethotrexateTherapyUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID32300735
PMCPMC7152823
OpenAlexW3004646087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.