ArticleInternet interventions2020
Gaining a deeper understanding of nutrition using social networks and user-generated content.
Article in Internet interventions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of chat GPT for sentiment and readability analysis of nutrition articles in legacy media.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Article
- Misinformation surrounding sodium reduction for blood pressure: content analysis of Japanese posts on X.Health promotion international · 2024Article
- Investigating the Role of Nutrition in Enhancing Immunity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Twitter Text-Mining Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Integrating Natural Language Processing and Interpretive Thematic Analyses to Gain Human-Centered Design Insights on HIV Mobile Health: Proof-of-Concept Analysis.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence assisted acute patient journey.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Review
- Toward a Better Understanding of the Intention to Use mHealth Apps: Exploratory Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Article
- Process Evaluation of the 'No Money No Time' Healthy Eating Website Promoted Using Social Marketing Principles. A Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Impact of Environmental Social Media Publications on User Satisfaction with and Trust in Tourism Businesses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using user-generated content (UGC) on Twitter, the present study identifies the main themes that revolve around the concept of healthy diet and determine user feelings about various foods. Using a dataset of tweets with the hashtag "#Diet" or "#FoodDiet" (n = 10.591), we first use a Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model to identify the food categories most discussed on Twitter. Then, based on the results of the LDA model, we apply sentiment analysis to divide the identified tweets into three groups (negative, positive and neutral) based on the feelings expressed in corresponding tweets. Finally, the text mining approach is performed to identify foods according to the feelings expressed about those in corresponding tweets, as well as to derive key indicators that collectively present the UGC-based knowledge of healthy eating. The results of the present study show that among the foods most negatively perceived in the UGC are bacon, sugar, processed foods, red meat, and snacks. By contrast, water, apples, salads, broccoli and spinach are evaluated more positively. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the collective UGC knowledge is lacking on such healthy foods as fish, poultry, dry beans, nuts, as well as yogurt and cheese. The results of the present study can help the World Health Organization (WHO), as well as other institutions concerned with the study of healthy eating, to improve their communication policies on healthy products and preparation of balanced diets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.