Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32300515›Full record

Review3 Biotech2020

Techniques for improving formulations of bioinoculants.

Twinkle Chaudhary, Mandeep Dixit, Rajesh Gera, Amritash Kumar Shukla, Anil Prakash, Govind Gupta, Pratyoosh Shukla

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Twinkle Chaudhary1Enzyme Technology and Protein Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001 India.
Mandeep Dixit1Enzyme Technology and Protein Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001 India.
Rajesh Gera2Department of Microbiology, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004 India.
Amritash Kumar ShuklaDepartment of Biology, JNV Amarkantak, Amarkantak, Madhya Pradesh 484886 India.
Anil Prakash4Department of Microbiology, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh India.
Govind Gupta4Department of Microbiology, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh India.
Pratyoosh Shukla1Enzyme Technology and Protein Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001 India.
Maharshi Dayanand University · INBarkatullah University · INChaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioinoculants are eco-friendly microorganisms having a variety of products commonly utilized for improving the potential of soil and providing the nutrient requirements to the host plant. The usage of chemical fertilizers is not beneficial because it affects the soil microbial communities on large scale. The toxicity of chemical fertilizer decreases the fertility of soil and causes microbial disruption. Bioinoculants that are used as PGPR play an important role in the enhancement of crop production and beneficial for both producers and consumers economically by protecting the soil during unfavourable conditions. The utilization of PGPR in the bioinoculant form imparts successfully sustain agricultural yield production and such formulated products contain living microbial cells of bioinoculants that also helps in seed treatment and enhances the mobilization process of nutrients by the low-cost process. This review mainly focuses on different bioinoculant formulations related to its recent approaches such as metabolite formulations, liquid formulations, solid carrier-based formulations and synthetic polymer-based formulations. This review also gives an overview of some aspects of the bioinoculant efficiency and their appropriate formulation, production and storage condition of microbial cells.

Indexed as

BioencapsulationBioinoculantsMetabolitePolymeric substanceSoil microbial communities

Identifiers

PMID32300515
PMCPMC7150665
OpenAlexW3015397993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.