ArticleStem cells international2020
Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Pulmonary Antimicrobial Immunity and Prevent Following Bacterial Infection.
Article in Stem cells international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial peptide PK34 modification enhances the antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects of bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Navigating mesenchymal stem cells doses and delivery routes in heart disease trials: A comprehensive overview.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Combining Advanced Therapies with Alternative Treatments: A New Approach to Managing Antimicrobial Resistance?Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Role of mesenchymal stem cells in sepsis and their therapeutic potential in sepsis‑associated myopathy (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in patients with systemic sclerosis: a 5-year follow-up study.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- Dihydroartemisinin regulates immune cell heterogeneity by triggering a cascade reaction of CDK and MAPK phosphorylation.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022Article
- Human Placental Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of ARDS in Rat.Stem cells international · 2022Article
- Mesenchymal stromal cells for the treatment of ocular autoimmune diseases.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021Review
- Medical progress: Stem cells as a new therapeutic strategy for COVID-19.Stem cell research · 2021Review
- Nanoconjugates-Based Stem Cell Therapy for the Management of COVID-19.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmunosuppressants such as cyclophosphamide (CTX) have been employed to treat a wide array of autoimmune diseases. The most unfavourable side effects of these drugs are their suppression on the antimicrobial immunity and increasing the risk of infection. As a promising substitution/adjunct, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are currently being tested in several clinical trials. However, their influence on the recipients' antimicrobial immunity remains unclear.
methodsIn this study, C57BL/6 mice were treated with either CTX or MSCs, and then both the innate and adaptive immunity of the lung were determined. To investigate the influence of CTX and MSCs on the immune defence against infection, the treated mice were intranasally infected with opportunistic pathogen
resultsOur data showed that CTX strongly inhibited the proliferation of lung immune cells, including alveolar macrophages (AMs) and T cells, whereas MSCs increased the numbers of these cells. CTX suppressed the phagocytic activity of AMs; on the contrary, MSCs enhanced it. Notably, infusion of MSCs led to a remarkable increase of regulatory T cells and Th1 cells in the lung. When infected by Hi, CTX did not significantly impair the elimination of invaded bacteria. However, MSC-treated mice exhibited accelerated bacterial clearance and moderate inflammation and tissue damage.
conclusionOur study reported that unlike traditional immunosuppressants, modulation of MSCs on the recipient's immune response is more elegant. It could preserve and even enhance the antimicrobial defence, suggesting that MSCs are better choice for patients with high risk of infection or those who need long-term immunosuppressive regimen.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.