ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
Viewing Art in Different Contexts.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is there any (emotional) difference between seeing art in the museum vs. in the lab? A comparative study of phenomenal art experiences of original artworks and digital reproductions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- A comparison of art engagement in museums and through digital media.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of labels in digital art experience: psychophysiological and behavioral evidence.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Thinking eyes: visual thinking strategies and the social brain.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Reading in the city: mobile eye-tracking and evaluation of text in an everyday setting.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- How do people distribute their attention while observingPerception · 2022Article
- The Image as Language: The Creation and the Use of the Visual Message by Young University Students in Their Communicative Social Activity.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Statistical image properties predict aesthetic ratings in abstract paintings created by neural style transfer.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- The role that composition plays in determining how a viewer looks at landscape art.Journal of eye movement research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While aesthetic experiences are not limited to any particular context, their sensorial, cognitive and behavioral properties can be profoundly affected by the circumstances in which they occur. Given the ubiquitous nature of contextual effects in nearly all aspects of behavior, investigations aimed at delineating the context-dependent and context-independent aspects of aesthetic experience and engagement with aesthetic objects in a diverse range of settings are important in empirical aesthetics. Here, we analyze the viewing behavior of visitors (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.