Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32300273›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2020

Clinical findings and

Chunjie Chen, Yue Xie, Tengyang Sun, Lu Tian, Ke Xu, Xiaohui Zhang, Yang Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Whole-exome sequencing identifies anExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chunjie ChenBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab. Beijing, China.
Yue XieBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab. Beijing, China.
Tengyang SunBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab. Beijing, China.
Lu TianBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab. Beijing, China.
Ke XuBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab. Beijing, China.
Xiaohui ZhangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab. Beijing, China.
Yang LiBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab. Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Tongren Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) is an early-onset retinal degenerative disorder caused by mutations in the Methods: All patients underwent clinical examination, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundus examination, and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). A combination of molecular screening methods, including Sanger-DNA sequencing of Results: The 90 probands (mean age 17.29±12.94 years; 3-52 years) showed a variety of clinical phenotypes, and their average best correct visual acuity was 0.81±0.48 (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution, 0-3). Of the 175 eyes analyzed, 140 (80%) had macular retinoschisis, 84 (48%) had peripheral retinoschisis, 28 (16%) had macular atrophy, and five (3%) had a normal macular structure. We identified 68 mutations in this cohort of patients, including 15 novel mutations. Most mutations (65%) were missense; the remaining null mutations included nonsense, splicing effect, frameshift indel, and large genomic DNA deletions. The 62 patients with missense mutations seemed to have relatively milder visual defects than the 28 patients with null mutations. Conclusions: Patients with

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAsian PeopleChildChild, PreschoolChromosomes, Human, XCodon, NonsenseCross-Sectional StudiesExomeEye ProteinsFrameshift MutationGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Diseases, X-LinkedHumansINDEL MutationMaleCodon, NonsenseEye ProteinsRS1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32300273
PMCPMC7155891
OpenAlexW3017322024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.