Observational studyScientific reports2020
The effect of optimistic expectancies on attention bias: Neural and behavioral correlates.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resting-state functional network segregation of the default mode network predicts valence bias across the lifespan.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Within-network brain connectivity during a social optimism task is related to personal optimism and optimism for in-group members.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Predictive modeling of optimism bias using gray matter cortical thickness.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Asymmetrical Update of Beliefs About Future Outcomes is Driven by Outcome Valence and Social Group Membership.International review of social psychology · 2023Article
- Future self-imagery of young people in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory mixed methods analysis.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Optimism, Daily Stressors, and Emotional Well-Being Over Two Decades in a Cohort of Aging Men.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022Article
- Whole-brain white matter correlates of personality profiles predictive of subjective well-being.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Active Inference Model of Coherence Therapy.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Enhanced sensitivity to optimistic cues is manifested in brain structure: a voxel-based morphometry study.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021Article
- Reduced network integration in default mode and executive networks is associated with social and personal optimism biases.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimism bias and positive attention bias are important features of healthy information processing. Recent findings suggest dynamic bidirectional optimism-attention interactions, but the underlying neural mechanisms remain to be identified. The current functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, therefore, investigated the neural mechanisms underlying causal effects of optimistic expectancies on attention. We hypothesized that expectancies guide attention to confirmatory evidence in the environment, with enhanced salience and executive control network (SN/ECN) activity for unexpected information. Moreover, based on previous findings, we anticipated optimistic expectancies to more strongly impact attention and SN/ECN activity than pessimistic expectancies. Expectancies were induced with visual cues in 50 participants; subsequent attention to reward and punishment was assessed in a visual search task. As hypothesized, cues shortened reaction times to expected information, and unexpected information enhanced SN/ECN activity. Notably, these effects were stronger for optimistic than pessimistic expectancy cues. Our findings suggest that optimistic expectancies involve particularly strong predictions of reward, causing automatic guidance of attention to reward and great surprise about unexpected punishment. Such great surprise may be counteracted by visual avoidance of the punishing evidence, as revealed by prior evidence, thereby reducing the need to update (over)optimistic reward expectancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.