Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32300214›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2020

The effect of optimistic expectancies on attention bias: Neural and behavioral correlates.

Laura Singh, Laurent Schüpbach, Dominik A Moser, Roland Wiest, Erno J Hermans, Tatjana Aue

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Optimism, Daily Stressors, and Emotional Well-Being Over Two Decades in a Cohort of Aging Men.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The Active Inference Model of Coherence Therapy.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura SinghDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. laura.singh@ki.se.
Laurent SchüpbachDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Dominik A MoserDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Roland WiestInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Erno J HermansDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tatjana AueDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. tatjana.aue@psy.unibe.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimism bias and positive attention bias are important features of healthy information processing. Recent findings suggest dynamic bidirectional optimism-attention interactions, but the underlying neural mechanisms remain to be identified. The current functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, therefore, investigated the neural mechanisms underlying causal effects of optimistic expectancies on attention. We hypothesized that expectancies guide attention to confirmatory evidence in the environment, with enhanced salience and executive control network (SN/ECN) activity for unexpected information. Moreover, based on previous findings, we anticipated optimistic expectancies to more strongly impact attention and SN/ECN activity than pessimistic expectancies. Expectancies were induced with visual cues in 50 participants; subsequent attention to reward and punishment was assessed in a visual search task. As hypothesized, cues shortened reaction times to expected information, and unexpected information enhanced SN/ECN activity. Notably, these effects were stronger for optimistic than pessimistic expectancy cues. Our findings suggest that optimistic expectancies involve particularly strong predictions of reward, causing automatic guidance of attention to reward and great surprise about unexpected punishment. Such great surprise may be counteracted by visual avoidance of the punishing evidence, as revealed by prior evidence, thereby reducing the need to update (over)optimistic reward expectancies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttentional BiasAvoidance LearningCuesExecutive FunctionFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetOptimismPessimismPhotic StimulationPunishment

Identifiers

PMID32300214
PMCPMC7162893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.