Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32300142›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Daily exposure to formaldehyde and acetaldehyde and potential health risk associated with use of high and low nicotine e-liquid concentrations.

Leon Kosmider, Sharon Cox, Marzena Zaciera, Jolanta Kurek, Maciej L Goniewicz, Hayden McRobbie, Catherine Kimber, Lynne Dawkins

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. E-Cigarette effects on oral health: A molecular perspective.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A study of 9 common breath VOCs in 504 healthy subjects using PTR-TOF-MS.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Vaping, Smoking and Lung Cancer Risk.Journal of oncology research and therapy · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leon KosmiderDepartment of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice FOPS in Sosnowiec, Jagiellonska 4, 41-200, Sosnowiec, Poland. leon.kosmider@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7837-9813
Sharon CoxCentre for Addictive Behaviours Research, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, SE1 0AA, London, UK.
Marzena ZacieraDepartment of Chemical Hazard and Genetic Toxicology, Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 41-200, Sosnowiec, Poland.
Jolanta KurekDepartment of Chemical Hazard and Genetic Toxicology, Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 41-200, Sosnowiec, Poland.
Maciej L GoniewiczRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Department of Health Behavior, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6748-3068
Hayden McRobbieQueen Mary University of London, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, E1 4NS, London, UK.
Catherine KimberCentre for Addictive Behaviours Research, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, SE1 0AA, London, UK.
Lynne DawkinsCentre for Addictive Behaviours Research, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, SE1 0AA, London, UK.

Funding

Project 4: Using a prospective cohort survey to test population-level predictions generated by Projects 1-3U54DA036105 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI FAGAN, PEBBLES · 2018 to 2022
$20.8M
Cancer Research UK 21130NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that e-cigarette users tend to change their puffing behaviors when using e-liquids with reduced nicotine concentrations by taking longer and more frequent puffs. Using puffing regimens modelled on puffing topography data from 19 experienced e-cigarette users who switched between 18 and 6 mg/mL e-liquids with and without power adjustments, differences in daily exposure to carbonyl compounds and estimated changes in cancer risk were assessed by production of aerosols generated using a smoking machine and analyzed using gas and liquid chromatography. Significant differences across conditions were found for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde (p < 0.01). Switching from a higher to a lower nicotine concentration was associated with greater exposure regardless of whether power settings were fixed or adjustable which is likely due to increased liquid consumption under lower nicotine concentration settings. Daily exposure for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde was higher for 17/19 participants when using low (6 mg/mL) compared with high (18 mg/mL) nicotine e-liquid concentration when power was fixed. When power adjustments were permitted, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde levels were higher respectively for 16/19 and 14/19 participants with the use of 6 compared with 18 mg/mL nicotine e-liquid.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAcetaldehydeAerosolsCarcinogensFormaldehydeHumansNeoplasmsNicotineRisk FactorsAcetaldehydeAerosolsCarcinogensFormaldehydeNicotine

Identifiers

PMID32300142
PMCPMC7162853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.