Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32299898›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open diabetes research & care2020

Can autonomy support have an effect on type 2 diabetes glycemic control? Results of a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Qingping Yun, Ying Ji, Shenglan Liu, Yang Shen, Xuewen Jiang, Xinyi Fan, Jingnan Liu, Chun Chang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Understanding Preferences for Weight Loss Diets Amongst Patients With a Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qingping YunSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Ying JiSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Shenglan LiuSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yang ShenSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xuewen JiangSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xinyi FanSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jingnan LiuSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Chun ChangSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China changchunpku@126.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7863-3316
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess whether social support or autonomy support intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes can achieve glycemic control at the end of intervention, and to test whether the glycemic control effect can be maintained for a long time. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsIn this cluster randomized controlled trial, 18 community healthcare stations (CHSs) were randomized to the following: (1) usual care group (UCG) offering regular public health management services, (2) social support group (SSG) providing 3-month social support intervention based on problem solving principles, and (3) autonomy support group (ASG) offering 3-month autonomy support intervention based on self-determination theory. A total of 364 patients registered in the CHSs were enrolled into either of the three groups. The primary outcome was hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and secondary outcomes were diabetes self-management (DSM) behaviors. Assessment was conducted at baseline and at 3 and 6 months.

resultsPatients in ASG achieved better HbA1c reduction at the end of intervention (0.53% or 7.23 mmol/mol, p

conclusionsAutonomy support for patients with type 2 diabetes could help achieve glycemic control at the end of intervention and successfully maintain it up to 6 months. These findings indicate that autonomy support has positive long-term effects on DSM behaviors and glycemic control and can be recommended in future diabetes intervention programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1900024354.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExerciseGlycated HemoglobinGlycemic ControlHealth BehaviorHumansGlycated Hemoglobinbehavior changecommunity-based research/interventionglycemic controlpatient self-management

Identifiers

PMID32299898
PMCPMC7199146
OpenAlexW3016832921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.