Trial reportThe European respiratory journal2020
The effect of exacerbation history on outcomes in the IMPACT trial.
Trial report in The European respiratory journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Maintenance Therapy Strategies for Quality of Life in COPD: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Pooled it
- Inhaled corticosteroids with combination inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The COURSE trial and beyond: rethinking chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation management with biologics.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Phosphodiesterase Inhibition as a Therapeutic Strategy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Where We Have Been and What Lies Ahead.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Clinical and Economic Burden of COPD in Patients on Inhaled Triple Therapy in Germany - A Retrospective Claims Data Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
- Burden of Exacerbations in Patients Newly Initiating an Inhaled Regimen for COPD: A Claims Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
- Quality of Care and Outcomes of Inpatients with COPD: A Multi-Center Study in China.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Observational
- Personalized COPD Care: The Future of Precision-Based Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Impact of exacerbation history on future risk and treatment outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A prospective cohort study based on Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) A and B classifications.Journal of global health · 2024Observational
- Exacerbation-like events in the 12 months prior to identification of chronic respiratory conditions in a primary care population.Respiratory medicine · 2024Article
- Implications of Cardiopulmonary Risk for the Management of COPD: A Narrative Review.Advances in therapy · 2024Review
- How inhaled corticosteroids target inflammation in COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023Review
- Rational use of inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of COPD.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2023Review
- Practical Recommendations for a Selection of Inhaled Corticosteroids in COPD: A Composite ICO Chart.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Towards precision in defining COPD exacerbations.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2021Review
- Current developments and future directions in COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020Article
- Predictive modeling of COPD exacerbation rates using baseline risk factors.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IMPACT, a 52-week, randomised, double-blind trial, assessed the efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) triple therapy
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.