Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32299456›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2020

The value of moderate dose escalation for re-irradiation of recurrent or second primary head-and-neck cancer.

Alexander Rühle, Tanja Sprave, Tobias Kalckreuth, Raluca Stoian, Erik Haehl, Constantinos Zamboglou, Roland Laszig, Andreas Knopf, Anca-Ligia Grosu, Nils H Nicolay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Re-irradiation in head and neck cancer: thirteen years of insights.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander RühleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Tanja SpraveDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Tobias KalckreuthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Raluca StoianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Erik HaehlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Constantinos ZamboglouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Roland LaszigDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas KnopfDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Anca-Ligia GrosuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Nils H NicolayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. nils.nicolay@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment for local and locoregional recurrence or second head-and-neck (H&N) cancers after previous radiotherapy is challenging, and re-irradiation carries a significantly increased risk for radiotherapy-related normal tissue toxicities and treatment failure due to a radioresistant tumor phenotype. Here, we analyzed re-irradiation management and outcomes in patients with recurrent or second primary H&N carcinoma using state-of-the-art diagnostic procedures and radiotherapy techniques.

methodsBetween 2010 and 2019, 48 patients with recurrent or second primary H&N carcinoma received re-radiotherapy at the University of Freiburg Medical Center and were included in this study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate Cox-regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of clinico-pathological factors on treatment outcomes. Acute and chronic treatment-related toxicities were quantified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.03).

resultsThirty-one patients (64.6%) received definitive and 17 (35.4%) adjuvant radiotherapy. Simultaneous chemotherapy was administered in 28 patients (58.3%) with cetuximab as the most commonly used systemic agent (n = 17, 60.7%). After a median time of 17 months (range 4 months to 176 months) between first and second radiotherapy, patients were re-irradiated with a median of 58.4 Gy and a treatment completion rate of 87.5% (n = 42). Median OS was 25 months with a 1-year OS amounting to 62.4%, and median PFS was 9 months with a 1-year PFS of 37.6%. Univariate analyses demonstrated that both a lower rT-status and a radiotherapy boost were associated with improved OS (p < 0.05). There was a trend towards superior OS for patients who received > 50 Gy (p = 0.091) and who completed the prescribed radiotherapy (p = 0.055). Five patients (10.4%) suffered from at least one grade 3 toxicities, while 9 patients (27.3%) experienced chronic higher-grade toxicities (≥ grade 3) with one (3.0%) grade 4 carotid blowout and one (3.0%) grade 4 osteoradionecrosis.

conclusionRe-irradiation of recurrent or second primary H&N cancer with modern radiation techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy resulted in promising survival rates with acceptable toxicities compared to historical cohorts. Increased re-irradiation doses, utilization of a radiotherapy boost and completion of the re-irradiation treatment were found to result in improved survival.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCetuximabChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Second PrimaryProgression-Free SurvivalRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRadiotherapy DosageCetuximabChemotherapyHead-and-neck cancerHead-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)RadiotherapyRecurrent head-and-neck cancerRe-irradiation

Identifiers

PMID32299456
PMCPMC7164259
OpenAlexW3017189588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.