Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32299416›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2020

Increased tooth mobility after fixed orthodontic appliance treatment can be selectively utilized for case refinement via positioner therapy - a pilot study.

L Keilig, J Goedecke, C Bourauel, N Daratsianos, C Dirk, A Jäger, A Konermann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04646265 (The Effect of Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment on the Biomechanical Properties of the Periodontal Tissues, a Prospective Comparative Clinical Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04646265 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment on the Biomechanical Properties of the Periodontal Tissues, a Prospective Comparative Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BonnRan2017 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsPeriodontal DiseasesArmsperiodontal treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L KeiligEndowed Professorship for Oral Medical Technology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
J GoedeckeEndowed Professorship for Oral Medical Technology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
C BourauelEndowed Professorship for Oral Medical Technology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
N DaratsianosDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111, Bonn, Germany.
C DirkEndowed Professorship for Oral Medical Technology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
A JägerDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111, Bonn, Germany.
A KonermannDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111, Bonn, Germany. konermann@uni-bonn.de.
University of Bonn · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft kfo208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased tooth mobility persists after fixed orthodontic appliance removal, which is therapeutically utilized for post-treatment finishing with positioners. As such a fine adjustment is only required for selected teeth, the aim of this pilot study was to investigate tooth mobility in vivo on corrected and uncorrected subgroups under positioner therapy.

methodsMobility was measured on upper teeth of 10 patients (mean age 16.8) by applying loadings for 0.1, 1.0 and 10.0 s with a novel device directly after multibracket appliance debonding as much as 2d, 1, 2 and 6 weeks later. Positioners were inserted at day 2. Specimens were divided into Group C (teeth corrected via positioner), Group N (uncorrected teeth adjacent to teeth from group C), and Group U (uncorrected teeth in an anchorage block). Untreated individuals served as controls (n = 10, mean age 22.4). Statistics were performed via Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Welch's unequal variances t-test for comparisons between groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsAfter 1 week, tooth mobility in Group U almost resembled controls (13.0-15.7 N), and reached physiological values after 6 weeks (17.4 N vs. 17.3 N in controls). Group C (9.0-13.4 N) and Group N (9.2-14.7 N) maintained increased mobility after 6 weeks. Tooth mobility was generally higher by reason of long loading durations (10.0 s).

conclusionsPositioner therapy can selectively utilized increased tooth mobility upon orthodontic fixed appliance treatment for case refinements. Here, uncorrected teeth in anchorage blocks are not entailed by unwanted side effects and recover after 6 weeks post treatment. Corrected teeth and their neighbors exhibit enhanced mobility even after 6 weeks, which represents a necessity for the proper correction of tooth position, and concurrently arouses the requirement for an adequate retention protocol.

Indexed as

Orthodontic Appliances, FixedAdultHumansInfantOrthodontic Anchorage ProceduresPilot ProjectsToothTooth MobilityTooth Movement TechniquesYoung AdultCase refinementOrthodontic tooth movementPositionerTooth mobility measurement

Identifiers

PMID32299416
PMCPMC7164254
OpenAlexW3017218205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.