Observational studyBMC pediatrics2020
Impact of rapid enterovirus polymerase chain reaction testing on management of febrile young infants < 90 days of age with aseptic meningitis.
Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular assays for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates: a diagnostic test accuracy review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- The impact of cerebrospinal fluid viral polymerase chain reaction testing on the management of adults with viral meningitis: A multi-center retrospective study.Journal of medical virology · 2023Article
- Detection of enterovirus in cerebrospinal fluids without pleocytosis in febrile infants under 3 months old reduces antibiotherapy duration.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Enteroviral Infections in the First Three Months of Life.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostic evaluation of febrile young infants is challenging. Empirical antimicrobial treatment is therefore common practice in this setting despite high percentage of causative viral infections. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of rapid enterovirus cerebrospinal fluid polymerase chain reaction (CSF EV PCR) test on hospital length of stay (LOS) and antimicrobial treatment duration in young febrile infants.
methodsRetrospective observational study comparing duration of antimicrobial treatment and hospital LOS before (May 1, 2014 - May 30, 2015, untested group) and after (June 1, 2015 - June 30, 2017, tested group) the introduction of rapid CSF EV PCR testing in infants < 90 days of age presenting with fever and CSF pleocytosis at the University Children's Hospital Zurich. Additionally, the same variables were compared after test introduction between CSF EV PCR positive and negative children.
resultsOne hundred twenty-eight children were enrolled in the study, 58 before and 70 after the introduction of rapid CSF EV PCR testing. Duration of antimicrobial treatment was significantly shortened in EV positive (n = 42) compared to both EV negative (n = 28) (median 18 h and 48 h, respectively, p < 0.001) and untested patients (n = 58) (median 18 h and 48 h, respectively, p < 0.001), and also in tested compared to untested group patients (median 36 vs 48 h, p < 0.001). Hospital LOS was significantly shortened in EV positive compared to EV negative patients (median 3 days and 4 days respectively, p = 0.013), while an overall reduction was not observed between tested and untested group patients.
conclusionsIn this study we demonstrate that antimicrobial treatment duration could be significantly shortened in neonates and young infants < 90 days of age with aseptic meningitis after the introduction of a rapid CSF EV PCR test compared to untested patients before test introduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.