Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32299353›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2020

Comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria.

Juliana Januario Gaudereto, Lauro Vieira Perdigão Neto, Gleice Cristina Leite, Evelyn Patricia Sanchez Espinoza, Roberta Cristina Ruedas Martins, Gladys Villas Boa Prado, Flavia Rossi, Thais Guimarães, Anna Sara Levin, Silvia Figueiredo Costa

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotic synergy againstAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bacteriological and molecular study of fosfomycin resistance in uropathogenic Escherichia coli.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juliana Januario GauderetoLaboratório de Investigação Médica 49 - LIM-49, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 470, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Lauro Vieira Perdigão NetoLaboratório de Investigação Médica 49 - LIM-49, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 470, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Gleice Cristina LeiteLaboratório de Investigação Médica 49 - LIM-49, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 470, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Evelyn Patricia Sanchez EspinozaLaboratório de Investigação Médica 49 - LIM-49, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 470, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Roberta Cristina Ruedas MartinsLaboratório de Investigação Médica 49 - LIM-49, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 470, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Gladys Villas Boa PradoLaboratório de Investigação Médica 49 - LIM-49, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 470, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Flavia RossiDivisão de Laboratório Central - Serviço de Microbiologia Clínica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Thais GuimarãesLaboratório de Investigação Médica 49 - LIM-49, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 470, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Anna Sara LevinLaboratório de Investigação Médica 49 - LIM-49, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 470, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Silvia Figueiredo CostaLaboratório de Investigação Médica 49 - LIM-49, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 470, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil. silvia.costa@pq.cnpq.br.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of combined antibiotic therapy has become an option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. The time-kill (TK) assay is considered the gold standard method for the evaluation of in vitro synergy, but it is a time-consuming and expensive method. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two methods for testing in vitro antimicrobial combinations: the disk diffusion method through disk approximation (DA) and the agar gradient diffusion method via the MIC:MIC ratio. The TK assay was included as the gold standard. MDR Gram-negative clinical isolates (n = 62; 28 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 20 Acinetobacter baumannii, and 14 Serratia marcescens) were submitted to TK, DA, and MIC:MIC ratio synergy methods.

resultsOverall, the agreement between the DA and TK assays ranged from 20 to 93%. The isolates of A. baumannii showed variable results of synergism according to TK, and the calculated agreement was statistically significant in this species against fosfomycin with meropenem including colistin-resistant isolates. The MIC:MIC ratiometric agreed from 35 to 71% with TK assays. The kappa test showed good agreement for the combination of colistin with amikacin (K = 0.58; P = 0.04) among the colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates.

conclusionsThe DA and MIC:MIC ratiometric methods are easier to perform and might be a more viable tool for clinical microbiology laboratories.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAmikacinColistinDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsDrug CombinationsDrug SynergismGram-Negative BacteriaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityAmikacinColistinDrug CombinationsDisk approximationGram-negativeMIC:MIC ratioMultidrug-resistantSynergyTime-kill

Identifiers

PMID32299353
PMCPMC7161189
OpenAlexW3016888373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.